Understanding the cluster randomised crossover design: a graphical illustraton of the components of variation and a sample size tutorial

被引:50
作者
Arnup, Sarah J. [1 ]
McKenzie, Joanne E. [1 ]
Hemming, Karla [2 ]
Pilcher, David [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Forbes, Andrew B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[3] Australian & New Zealand Intens Care Soc Ctr Out, Carlton, Vic 3154, Australia
[4] Alfred Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Australian & New Zealand Intens Care Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Alfred Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cluster randomised; Crossover; Sample size; Intracluster correlation; Within-period correlation; Between-period correlation; Components of variability; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; TRIALS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-017-2113-2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: In a cluster randomised crossover (CRXO) design, a sequence of interventions is assigned to a group, or 'cluster' of individuals. Each cluster receives each intervention in a separate period of time, forming 'cluster-periods'. Sample size calculations for CRXO trials need to account for both the cluster randomisation and crossover aspects of the design. Formulae are available for the two-period, two-intervention, cross-sectional CRXO design, however implementation of these formulae is known to be suboptimal. The aims of this tutorial are to illustrate the intuition behind the design; and provide guidance on performing sample size calculations. Methods: Graphical illustrations are used to describe the effect of the cluster randomisation and crossover aspects of the design on the correlation between individual responses in a CRXO trial. Sample size calculations for binary and continuous outcomes are illustrated using parameters estimated from the Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society - Adult Patient Database (ANZICS-APD) for patient mortality and length(s) of stay (LOS). Results: The similarity between individual responses in a CRXO trial can be understood in terms of three components of variation: variation in cluster mean response; variation in the cluster-period mean response; and variation between individual responses within a cluster-period; or equivalently in terms of the correlation between individual responses in the same cluster-period (within-cluster within-period correlation, WPC), and between individual responses in the same cluster, but in different periods (within-cluster between-period correlation, BPC). The BPC lies between zero and the WPC. When the WPC and BPC are equal the precision gained by crossover aspect of the CRXO design equals the precision lost by cluster randomisation. When the BPC is zero there is no advantage in a CRXO over a parallel-group cluster randomised trial. Sample size calculations illustrate that small changes in the specification of the WPC or BPC can increase the required number of clusters. Conclusions: By illustrating how the parameters required for sample size calculations arise from the CRXO design and by providing guidance on both how to choose values for the parameters and perform the sample size calculations, the implementation of the sample size formulae for CRXO trials may improve.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Patterns of intra-cluster correlation from primary care research to inform study design and analysis [J].
Adams, G ;
Gulliford, MC ;
Ukoumunne, OC ;
Eldridge, S ;
Chinn, S ;
Campbell, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (08) :785-794
[2]   Appropriate statistical methods were infrequently used in cluster-randomized crossover trials [J].
Arnup, Sarah J. ;
Forbes, Andrew B. ;
Kahan, Brennan C. ;
Morgan, Katy E. ;
McKenzie, Joanne E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 74 :40-50
[3]   Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Fayers, PM ;
Grimshaw, JM .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 2 (02) :99-107
[4]   CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Elbourne, DR ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441) :702-708
[5]   Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-cluster designs [J].
Donner, A ;
Klar, N ;
Zou, GY .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (04) :919-925
[6]   RANDOMIZATION BY CLUSTER - SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS AND ANALYSIS [J].
DONNER, A ;
BIRKETT, N ;
BUCK, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1981, 114 (06) :906-914
[7]   How big should the pilot study for my cluster randomised trial be? [J].
Eldridge, Sandra M. ;
Costelloe, Ceire E. ;
Kahan, Brennan C. ;
Lancaster, Gillian A. ;
Kerry, Sally M. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (03) :1039-1056
[8]  
Eldridge SM., 2012, A practical guide to cluster randomised trials in health services research
[9]   COHORT VERSUS CROSS-SECTIONAL DESIGN IN LARGE FIELD TRIALS - PRECISION, SAMPLE-SIZE, AND A UNIFYING MODEL [J].
FELDMAN, HA ;
MCKINLAY, SM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (01) :61-78
[10]   Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: Application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care [J].
Forbes, Andrew B. ;
Akram, Muhammad ;
Pilcher, David ;
Cooper, Jamie ;
Bellomo, Rinaldo .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 12 (01) :34-44