Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer

被引:82
作者
Law, Wai Lun [1 ]
Foo, Dominic C. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Surg, 102 Pokfulam Rd, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2017年 / 31卷 / 07期
关键词
Survival; Outcomes; Robotic rectal resection; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; ASSISTED RESECTION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OPEN SURGERY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SEXUAL FUNCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Laparoscopic rectal resection with total mesorectal excision is a technically challenging procedure, and there are limitations in conventional laparoscopy. A surgical robotic system may help to overcome some of the limitations. This study aimed to compare the short-term operative as well as oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic rectal resection. Methods This study was based on a prospectively collected database of patients with mid-to distal rectal cancer (up to 12 cm from the anal verge) undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection from January 2008 to June 2015. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative parameters and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Patient survival and recurrence were also compared. Results During the study period, 171 and 220 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic rectal resection, respectively. The median age was 65 years (range 23-96). The median tumor distance was 8 and 7 cm from the anal verge in the laparoscopic and robotic groups, respectively (p = 0.06). Significantly more male patients and more patients with comorbidities and preoperative radiation underwent robotic surgery. The median operating time for robotic resection was significantly longer, 260 versus 225 min (p < 0.001). Conversion rates of laparoscopic and robotic resection were 3.5 and 0.8 %, respectively (p = 0.308). The median hospital stay was 6 days in both groups (p = 0.29). There was no difference in the overall complication rate, but the incidence of urinary retention was significantly less in the robotic group (4.1 vs. 10.5 %, p = 0.024). With a median follow-up of 31 months, there was no difference in local recurrence, overall survival and disease-specific survival between the two groups. Conclusions In the treatment of mid-to low rectal cancer, robotic resection can achieve operative results and oncologic outcomes comparable to laparoscopic resection. The postoperative urinary retention rate is lower following robotic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:2798 / 2807
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms [J].
Baik, Seung Hyuk ;
Lee, Woo Jung ;
Rha, Koon Ho ;
Kim, Nam Kyu ;
Sohn, Seung Kook ;
Chi, Hoon Sang ;
Cho, Chang Hwan ;
Lee, Sang Kil ;
Cheon, Jae Hee ;
Ahn, Joong Bae ;
Kim, Won Ho .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (03) :792-797
[2]  
Bonjer HJ, 2009, DAN MED BULL, V56, P89
[3]   A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer [J].
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
Deijen, Charlotte L. ;
Abis, Gabor A. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
van der Pas, Martijn H. G. M. ;
de lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. ;
Lacy, Antonio M. ;
Bemelman, Willem A. ;
Andersson, John ;
Angenete, Eva ;
Rosenberg, Jacob ;
Fuerst, Alois ;
Haglind, Eva .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (14) :1324-1332
[4]   Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer [J].
Chan, Albert C. Y. ;
Poon, Jensen T. C. ;
Fan, Joe K. M. ;
Lo, Siu Hung ;
Law, Wai Lun .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (12) :2625-2630
[5]  
ENKER WE, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V181, P335
[6]   Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Fleshman, James ;
Branda, Megan ;
Sargent, Daniel J. ;
Boller, Anne Marie ;
George, Virgilio ;
Abbas, Maher ;
Peters, Walter R., Jr. ;
Maun, Dipen ;
Chang, George ;
Herline, Alan ;
Fichera, Alessandro ;
Mutch, Matthew ;
Wexner, Steven ;
Whiteford, Mark ;
Marks, John ;
Birnbaum, Elisa ;
Margolin, David ;
Larson, David ;
Marcello, Peter ;
Posner, Mitchell ;
Read, Thomas ;
Monson, John ;
Wren, Sherry M. ;
Pisters, Peter W. T. ;
Nelson, Heidi .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (13) :1346-1355
[7]   The Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Low Rectal Resection of a Novice Rectal Surgeon [J].
Foo, Chi Chung ;
Law, Wai Lun .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (02) :456-462
[8]   Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer [J].
Green, B. L. ;
Marshall, H. C. ;
Collinson, F. ;
Quirke, P. ;
Guillou, P. ;
Jayne, D. G. ;
Brown, J. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (01) :75-82
[9]   Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Guillou, PJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Thorpe, H ;
Walker, J ;
Jayne, DG ;
Smith, AMH ;
Heath, RM ;
Brown, JM .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) :1718-1726
[10]   THE MESORECTUM IN RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY - THE CLUE TO PELVIC RECURRENCE [J].
HEALD, RJ ;
HUSBAND, EM ;
RYALL, RDH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (10) :613-616