Methodological considerations in performing semantic- and translation-priming experiments across languages

被引:72
作者
Altarriba, Jeanette [1 ]
Basnight-Brown, Dana M. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Dept Psychol, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03192839
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Research in the field of bilingualism has had as its principal aim to describe the structure and function of memory for bilingual speakers. A primary technique that has been used to examine bilingual memory is an examination of cross-language word priming (semantic and translation), using the lexical decision and pronunciation tasks. Although studies have, on occasion, revealed greater degrees of word priming from a dominant to a. subordinate language, in comparison with the reverse, a careful review of the methodology that has been used reveals a number of issues that render conclusions such as this quite problematic. Parameters of concern include language proficiency, cognate status, masking, control conditions, word frequency and length, stimulus onset asynchrony, relatedness proportion, and nonword ratio. These factors are discussed, as well as recommendations for conducting future empirical research in this area of investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Altarriba, 1992, COGNITIVE PROCESSING, P157, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61493-4
[2]   The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times [J].
Altarriba, J ;
Kroll, JF ;
Sholl, A ;
Rayner, K .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1996, 24 (04) :477-492
[3]   Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: Token individuation for translation equivalents [J].
Altarriba, J ;
Soltano, EG .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1996, 24 (06) :700-711
[4]   Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals [J].
Altarriba, J ;
Kambe, G ;
Pollatsek, A ;
Rayner, K .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2001, 63 (05) :875-890
[5]  
Altarriba J., 2003, International Journal of Bilingualism, V7, P305, DOI [10.1177/13670069030070030501, DOI 10.1177/13670069030070030501]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Basic processes in reading, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203052242-12
[7]   WHERE ARE THE EFFECTS OF FREQUENCY IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION TASKS - RIGHT WHERE WE SAID THEY WERE - COMMENT [J].
BALOTA, DA ;
CHUMBLEY, JI .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1990, 119 (02) :231-237
[8]   THE LOCUS OF WORD-FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN THE PRONUNCIATION TASK - LEXICAL ACCESS AND OR PRODUCTION [J].
BALOTA, DA ;
CHUMBLEY, JI .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (01) :89-106
[9]   ARE LEXICAL DECISIONS A GOOD MEASURE OF LEXICAL ACCESS - THE ROLE OF WORD-FREQUENCY IN THE NEGLECTED DECISION STAGE [J].
BALOTA, DA ;
CHUMBLEY, JI .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1984, 10 (03) :340-357
[10]   CATEGORY NORMS FOR VERBAL ITEMS IN 56 CATEGORIES - A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION OF CONNECTICUT CATEGORY NORMS [J].
BATTIG, WF ;
MONTAGUE, WE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 80 (3P2) :1-&