Enhancement of Hydrogen Production by Fluidization in Industrial-Scale Steam Reformers

被引:3
作者
Abbasi, Mohsen [1 ]
Farniaei, Mehdi [2 ]
Abbasi, Saeid [3 ]
机构
[1] Persian Gulf Univ, Sch Chem & Petr Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Bushehr 75169, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Shiraz 71555313, Iran
[3] South Pars Gas Complex Co, Dev & Engn Management Dept, Assaluyeh 75391311, Iran
关键词
hydrogen production; methane steam reforming; fixed-bed reactor; fluidized-bed reactor; thermally coupled reactor;
D O I
10.1134/S0040579518030016
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this paper, the effect of the fluidization concept on the performance of methane steam reforming has been investigated by comparing a fluidized-bed steam reformer (FBSR) with an industrial-scale conventional steam reformer (CSR). Also, a fluidized-bed thermally coupled steam reformer (TCFBSR) and a fixed-bed thermally coupled steam reformer (TCSR) have been compared. In thermally coupled reactors, the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline exothermic reaction is employed. A steady state one dimensional heterogeneous model is applied to analyze methane conversion and hydrogen production for steam reforming of methane in different reactors (CSR, FBSR, TCSR, and TCFBSR). The modeling results show that, in FBSR, hydrogen production and methane conversion are increased by 2.13 and 0.52%, respectively, in comparison with CSR. Also, by using fluidized catalysts instead of fixed ones in TCSR, methane conversion and hydrogen yield are increased from 0.2776 to 0.2934 and from 0.9649 to 0.9836, respectively. These improvements represent the appropriate effect of the fluidization concept on the enhancement of hydrogen production in different steam reformers.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 428
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abashar MEE, 2004, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V29, P799, DOI 10.1016/j.jjhydene.2003.09.010
[2]   Modeling of a novel membrane reactor to integrate dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene with hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline [J].
Abo-Ghander, Nabeel S. ;
Grace, John R. ;
Elnashaie, Said S. E. H. ;
Lim, C. Jim .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2008, 63 (07) :1817-1826
[3]   A novel integrated thermally coupled configuration for methane-steam reforming and hydrogenation of nitrobenzene to aniline [J].
Aboosadi, Z. Arab ;
Rahimpour, M. R. ;
Jahanmiri, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (04) :2960-2968
[4]   Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of combined carbon dioxide reforming with partial oxidation of methane to syngas [J].
Amin, Nor Aishah Saidina ;
Yaw, Tung Chun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (12) :1789-1798
[5]   Kinetic investigations of the deactivation by coking of a noble metal catalyst in the catalytic hydrogenation of nitrobenzene using a catalytic wall reactor [J].
Amon, B ;
Redlingshöfer, H ;
Klemm, E ;
Dieterich, E ;
Emig, G .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 1999, 38 (4-6) :395-404
[6]   Development of a membrane-assisted fluidized bed reactor. 1. Gas phase back-mixing and bubble-to-emulsion phase mass transfer using tracer injection and ultrasound experiments [J].
Deshmukh, SARK ;
Laverman, JA ;
Cents, AHG ;
Annaland, MVS ;
Kuipers, JAM .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (16) :5955-5965
[7]   Process integration, modelling and optimisation for energy saving and pollution reduction [J].
Friedler, Ferenc .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 30 (16) :2270-2280
[8]   A simulation study of the steam reforming of methane in a dense tubular membrane reactor [J].
Gallucci, F ;
Paturzo, L ;
Basile, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2004, 29 (06) :611-617
[9]   An overview of hydrogen production technologies [J].
Holladay, J. D. ;
Hu, J. ;
King, D. L. ;
Wang, Y. .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2009, 139 (04) :244-260
[10]   Differential evolution (DE) strategy for optimization of hydrogen production, cyclohexane dehydrogenation and methanol synthesis in a hydrogen-permselective membrane thermally coupled reactor [J].
Khademi, M. H. ;
Rahimpour, M. R. ;
Jahanmiri, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (05) :1936-1950