Pushing the future back: The impact of policy uncertainty on the market pricing of future earnings

被引:13
作者
Drake, Michael S. [1 ]
Mayberry, Michael A. [2 ]
Wilde, Jaron H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Marriott Sch Management, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Warrington Coll Business Adm, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Henry B Tippie Coll Business, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
future earnings response coefficient; policy uncertainty; INFORMATION UNCERTAINTY; CROSS-SECTION; STOCK; DISCLOSURE; RETURN; TIMELINESS; EFFICIENCY; ACCRUALS; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/jbfa.12316
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine whether policy uncertainty triggered by presidential elections pushes the future back by reducing the extent to which current prices reflect information about future earnings. We estimate future earnings response coefficients (FERCs) for the years 1975-2013, a period that covers ten presidential elections. We find that FERCs are significantly lower (by 11.8%) during presidential election years compared to other years. Additional analyses using pseudo election years, ex-ante polls, contract prices from the Iowa Electronic Political Market, and cross-sectional firm characteristics provide corroborating evidence that the lower FERCs during election years are related to policy uncertainty. We also investigate potential explanations for the lower FERCs during election years. We find that the lower FERCs relate to forecasting difficulty rather than to changes in the discount rate or in the amount of noise trading. Finally, we find that market prices move toward future earnings to a greater degree during presidential election years compared with other years once the policy uncertainty is resolved. A trading strategy based on this drift yields significant abnormal returns. Overall, we contribute to the literature by providing the first empirical evidence that shocks to policy uncertainty influence the pricing of earnings information.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 927
页数:33
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Income distribution, political instability, and investment [J].
Alesina, A ;
Perotti, R .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 40 (06) :1203-1228
[2]   Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects [J].
Amihud, Y .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2002, 5 (01) :31-56
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MEASURE EC POLICY UN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, ACCOUNT REV
[5]   Evidence that analyst following and institutional ownership accelerate the pricing of future earnings [J].
Ayers, BC ;
Freeman, RN .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2003, 8 (01) :47-67
[6]   EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF ACCOUNTING INCOME NUMBERS [J].
BALL, R ;
BROWN, P .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1968, 6 (02) :159-178
[7]  
Baloria V, 2015, WORKING PAPER
[8]  
Barone M., 2014, WALL STREET J
[9]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH IN A CROSS-SECTION OF COUNTRIES [J].
BARRO, RJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1991, 106 (02) :407-443
[10]   The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings [J].
Basu, S .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1997, 24 (01) :3-37