Hand fine motor skills and use of both hand and arm in subjects after a stroke: a systematic review

被引:3
作者
Ostolaza, Marco [1 ]
Abudarham, Julia [1 ]
Dilascio, Sofia [1 ]
Drault-Boedo, Emilia [1 ]
Gallo, Sabrina [1 ]
Garcete, Alejandra [1 ]
Kramer, Marcia [1 ]
Maiaru, Mariano [1 ]
Mendelevich, Alejandro [1 ]
Modica, Mariela [1 ]
Peralta, Federico [1 ]
Sanchez-Correa, Cecilia [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Rehabil Psicofis, Avda Coronel Diaz 1433,Piso 7,Dpto 16, RA-1406 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Clinical utility; Reliability; Responsiveness; Stroke; Upper limb; Validity; UPPER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION; FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT; MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE; UPPER-LIMB FUNCTION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; OUTCOME MEASURES; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; ACTIVITY INVENTORY; RASCH VALIDATION; CHEDOKE ARM;
D O I
10.33588/rn.6407.2016516
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. In clinical practice it is important to be able to assess the function of the upper limb of the patient who has suffered a stroke. There is currently no systemic review that could identify assessment tools for the 'fine use of the hand' and 'use of both hand and arm'. Aims. Primary, to identify observational tools which can assess the fine use of the hand and the use of both hand and arm in patients with stroke sequels. Secondary, to analyze the bias risk in the included articles, describing and categorizing the clinical utility, validity and reliability. Patients and methods. A search was carried in Medline, LILACS, SciELO and Open Grey, which included articles published until October 2015. Studies that validate assessing tools of the upper limb in subjects with a stroke sequel which evaluate the fine use of the hand and the use of both hand and arm were included. Results. Eleven tools in evaluate observational haven been selected, which assess the fine use of the hand and the use of hand and arm. Conclusions. In every case both validity and reliability have been reported, but clinical utility has been less considered for assessment. The studies that researched these tools showed a high risk of bias in their development. ARAT-19 showed a lower bias risk, but when it has to do with applicability and the reference trial is taken into account, the level of concern is high.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke [J].
Alt Murphy, Margit ;
Resteghini, Carol ;
Feys, Peter ;
Lamers, Ilse .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2015, 15
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CLAS INT FUNC DISC S
[3]  
[Anonymous], EVIDENCE BASED REV S
[4]  
Cuadrado AA, 2009, GALICIA CLIN, V70, P25
[5]   EVALUATION OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME MEASURES FOR THE HEMIPARETIC UPPER LIMB: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [J].
Ashford, Stephen ;
Slade, Mike ;
Malaprade, Fabienne ;
Turner-Stokes, Lynne .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2008, 40 (10) :787-795
[6]  
Avelino P, 2013, REV TER OCUP U SAO P, V24, P273
[7]  
Barreca S, 2000, PHYSIOTHER CAN, V58, P148
[8]   Comparing 2 versions of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory with the Action Research Arm Test [J].
Barreca, SR ;
Stratford, PW ;
Masters, LM ;
Lambert, CL ;
Griffiths, J .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 86 (02) :245-253
[9]   Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: A new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke [J].
Barreca, SR ;
Stratford, PW ;
Lambert, CL ;
Masters, LM ;
Streiner, DL .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (08) :1616-1622
[10]  
Barreca Susan, 2004, Top Stroke Rehabil, V11, P31