Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law

被引:20
作者
Ganel, Tzvi [1 ]
Namdar, Gal [1 ]
Mirsky, Avigail [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, IL-8410500 Beer Sheva, Israel
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2017年 / 7卷
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
PERCEPTION; TIME; VIOLATE; VISION; TASK; CUES;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-06799-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
According to Weber's law, a fundamental principle of perception, visual resolution decreases in a linear fashion with an increase in object size. Previous studies have shown, however, that unlike for perception, grasping does not adhere to Weber's law. Yet, this research was limited by the fact that perception and grasping were examined for a restricted range of stimulus sizes bounded by the maximum fingers span. The purpose of the current study was to test the generality of the dissociation between perception and action across a different type of visuomotor task, that of bimanual grasping. Bimanual grasping also allows to effectively measure visual resolution during perception and action across a wide range of stimulus sizes compared to unimanual grasps. Participants grasped or estimated the sizes of large objects using both their hands. The results showed that bimanual grasps violated Weber's law throughout the entire movement trajectory. In contrast, Just Noticeable Differences (JNDs) for perceptual estimations of the objects increased linearly with size, in agreement with Weber's law. The findings suggest that visuomotor control, across different types of actions and for a large range of size, is based on absolute rather than on relative representation of object size.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Baird JohnC., 1978, FUNDAMENTALS SCALING
[2]   Both vision-for-perception and vision-for-action follow Weber's law at small object sizes, but violate it at larger sizes [J].
Bruno, Nicola ;
Uccelli, Stefano ;
Viviani, Eva ;
de'Sperati, Claudio .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2016, 91 :327-334
[3]   Inferences about time course of Weber's Law violate statistical principles [J].
Foster, Rachel M. ;
Franz, Volker H. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2013, 78 :56-60
[4]   Effects of visual illusions on grasping [J].
Franz, VH ;
Fahle, M ;
Bülthoff, HH ;
Gegenfurtner, KR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (05) :1124-1144
[5]   Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape [J].
Ganel, T ;
Goodale, MA .
NATURE, 2003, 426 (6967) :664-667
[6]   Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles [J].
Ganel, Tzvi ;
Chajut, Eran ;
Algom, Daniel .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (14) :R599-R601
[7]   Weber's law in grasping [J].
Ganel, Tzvi .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2015, 15 (08)
[8]   Action is immune to the effects of Weber's law throughout the entire grasping trajectory [J].
Ganel, Tzvi ;
Freud, Erez ;
Meiran, Nachshon .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2014, 14 (07) :1-11
[9]   Response: When does grasping escape Weber's law? [J].
Ganel, Tzvi ;
Chajut, Eran ;
Tanzer, Michal ;
Algom, Daniel .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (23) :R1090-R1091
[10]   Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching [J].
Glover, SR ;
Dixon, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (03) :560-572