Comparison of the Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus to More Complex Disease Activity Instruments As Evaluated by Clinical Investigators or Real-World Clinicians

被引:9
作者
Askanase, Anca D. [1 ]
Nguyen, Samantha C. [1 ]
Costenbader, Karen [2 ]
Lim, S. Sam [3 ]
Kamen, Diane [4 ]
Aranow, Cynthia [5 ]
Grossman, Jennifer [6 ]
Kapoor, Teja M. [1 ]
Baker-Frost, DeAnna [4 ]
Aberle, Teresa [7 ]
Thanou-Stavraki, Aikaterini [7 ]
Hanrahan, Leslie M. [8 ]
Kim, Mimi [9 ]
Merrill, Joan T. [10 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, 630 West 168th St,P&S 10-508, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Manhasset, NY USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[8] Lupus Fdn Amer, Washington, DC USA
[9] Albert Einstein Coll Med, New York, NY USA
[10] Oklahoma Med Res Fdn, 825 NE 13th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
关键词
REVISED CRITERIA; ACTIVITY INDEX; ERYTHEMATOSUS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/acr.23445
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveLupus disease measures such as the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index are challenging to interpret. The Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) is intended to provide an efficient application of anchored visual analog scores, each representing the individual severity of active symptoms, with the sum of individual scores deriving an overall disease activity assessment. Our objective was to compare the performance of LFA-REAL to systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity assessments and compare scores between trained lupus clinical investigators and clinicians. MethodsInvestigators scored the SLEDAI, BILAG, physician's global assessment (PGA), and LFA-REAL, while the clinicians scored the LFA-REAL. The level of agreement between physicians and instruments was determined. ResultsThe study included 99 patients (93% women, 31% white, mean SD ages 43.4 +/- 13.2 years). At the first visit, the mean +/- SD SLEDAI score was 5.5 +/- 4.5, BILAG score 6.7 +/- 7.8, and PGA score 33.6 +/- 24.5. The mean +/- SD investigator LFA-REAL score was 46.2 +/- 42.9, and clinician LFA-REAL score 56.1 +/- 53.6. At the second visit, the mean +/- SD investigator LFA-REAL score was 41.3 +/- 36.7, and clinician LFA-REAL score 48.3 +/- 42.6. Total LFA-REAL scores correlated positively with PGA, SLEDAI, and BILAG ( = 0.58-0.88, P < 0.001). LFA-REAL scores produced correlation coefficients of > 0.7 for musculoskeletal, mucocutaneous, and renal BILAG domains. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the LFA-REAL scores of investigators and clinicians was 0.79 for visit 1 (P < 0.001) and 0.86 for visit 2 (P < 0.001). ConclusionThe LFA-REAL provides a reliable surrogate for more complicated disease activity measures when used by lupus clinical investigators or clinicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1063
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Askanase A, 2015, EUR LEAG RHEUM ANN M
  • [2] Preliminary test of the LFA rapid evaluation of activity in lupus (LFA-REAL): an efficient outcome measure correlates with validated instruments
    Askanase, Anca
    Li, Xiaoqing
    Pong, Avery
    Shum, Katrina
    Kamp, Stan
    Carthen, Fredonna
    Aberle, Teresa
    Hanrahan, Leslie
    Daly, Paola
    Giles, Jon
    Merrill, Joan T.
    [J]. LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2015, 2 (01):
  • [3] DERIVATION OF THE SLEDAI - A DISEASE-ACTIVITY INDEX FOR LUPUS PATIENTS
    BOMBARDIER, C
    GLADMAN, DD
    UROWITZ, MB
    CARON, D
    CHANG, CH
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1992, 35 (06): : 630 - 640
  • [4] The effect of combined estrogen and progesterone hormone replacement therapy on disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus:: A randomized trial
    Buyon, JP
    Petri, MA
    Kim, MY
    Kalunian, KC
    Grossman, J
    Hahn, BH
    Merrill, JT
    Sammaritano, L
    Lockshin, M
    Alarcón, GS
    Manzi, S
    Belmont, HM
    Askanase, AD
    Sigler, L
    Dooley, MA
    Von Feldt, J
    McCune, WJ
    Friedman, A
    Wachs, J
    Cronin, M
    Hearth-Holmes, M
    Tan, M
    Licciardi, F
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (12) : 953 - 962
  • [5] Cohen J., 1998, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, V4
  • [6] Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus
    Hochberg, MC
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1997, 40 (09): : 1725 - 1725
  • [7] BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
    Isenberg, DA
    Rahman, A
    Allen, E
    Farewell, V
    Akil, M
    Bruce, IN
    D'Cruz, D
    Griffiths, B
    Khamashta, M
    Maddison, P
    McHugh, N
    Snaith, M
    Teh, LS
    Yee, CS
    Zoma, A
    Gordon, C
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 44 (07) : 902 - 906
  • [8] Data Quality Challenges in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Trials: How Can This Be Optimized?
    Pike, Marilyn C.
    Kelley, Lexy
    [J]. CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 14 (04) : 324 - 333
  • [9] Advances in the assessment of lupus disease activity and damage
    Rao, Vijay
    Gordon, Caroline
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 26 (05) : 510 - 519
  • [10] International consensus for a definition of disease flare in lupus
    Ruperto, N.
    Hanrahan, L. M.
    Alarcon, G. S.
    Belmont, H. M.
    Brey, R. L.
    Brunetta, P.
    Buyon, J. P.
    Costner, M. I.
    Cronin, M. E.
    Dooley, M. A.
    Filocamo, G.
    Fiorentino, D.
    Fortin, P. R.
    Franks, A. G., Jr.
    Gilkeson, G.
    Ginzler, E.
    Gordon, C.
    Grossman, J.
    Hahn, B.
    Isenberg, D. A.
    Kalunian, K. C.
    Petri, M.
    Sammaritano, L.
    Sanchez-Guerrero, J.
    Sontheimer, R. D.
    Strand, V.
    Urowitz, M.
    von Feldt, J. M.
    Werth, V. P.
    Merrill, J. T.
    [J]. LUPUS, 2011, 20 (05) : 453 - 462