A frequency domain step response identification method for continuous-time processes with time delay

被引:58
|
作者
Liu, Tao [1 ]
Gao, Furong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Step response identification; Continuous-time process; Time delay; Frequency response estimation; Damping factor; Least-squares fitting; NONZERO INITIAL CONDITIONS; DEAD-TIME; ROBUST IDENTIFICATION; CONTINUOUS SYSTEMS; PROCESS MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.04.007
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Step response test is widely practiced for model identification in process industry. A frequency domain step response identification method is proposed for obtaining a continuous-time process model with time delay. By introducing a damping factor to the step response for realization of Laplace transform, a frequency response estimation algorithm is first proposed, in which only single integral is needed for computation, compared to recently developed identification methods based on multiple integral in time domain. Based on the estimated frequency response, two model fitting algorithms are developed analytically for obtaining a time delay model of first-, second-, or higher order with repetitive poles. Another two algorithms based on fitting multiple frequency response points thus estimated are proposed for obtaining a time delay model of any order, the latter of which may also be used to improve fitting accuracy over a specified frequency range interested to control design. Meanwhile, practical strategies to consolidate identification robustness against measurement noise are given based on consistent estimation analysis, together with a guideline for model structure selection to realize optimal fitting for identification of a high order process. Illustrative examples from recent references are used to demonstrate the effectiveness and merits of the proposed identification algorithms. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 809
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Transformation Method for Continuous-Time Markov Decision Processes
    Alexey Piunovskiy
    Yi Zhang
    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2012, 154 : 691 - 712
  • [32] Continuous-time Garch processes
    Brockwell, Peter
    Chadraa, Erdenebaatar
    Lindner, Alexander
    ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2006, 16 (02): : 790 - 826
  • [33] Recursive IV Identification of Continuous-Time Models With Time Delay From Sampled Data
    Chen, Fengwei
    Gamier, Hugues
    Padilla, Arturo
    Gilson, Marion
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 28 (03) : 1074 - 1082
  • [34] Dynamic identification of a bridge pile modeled in continuous-time domain
    Tesu, L.
    Atanasiu, G. M.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: EMPHASIS ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, 2017, : 2198 - 2204
  • [35] Identification of continuous-time Box-Jenkins models with arbitrary time-delay
    Mahata, Kaushik
    Gamier, Hugues
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 46TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2007, : 6006 - +
  • [36] Optimal and superoptimal rates of frequency polygons for continuous-time processes
    Lejeune, FX
    COMPTES RENDUS MATHEMATIQUE, 2005, 341 (01) : 59 - 62
  • [37] Robust System Identification of Continuous-Time Model from Frequency Response Function Data
    Tang, Wei
    Shi, Zhongke
    2011 9TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (WCICA 2011), 2011, : 661 - 665
  • [38] Iterative identification method for linear continuous-time systems
    Campi, Marco C.
    Sugie, Toshiharu
    Sakai, Fumitoshi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2006, : 818 - +
  • [39] On a continuous-time system identification using optimization method
    Iwase, M
    Shiino, Y
    Hatakeyama, S
    SICE 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2002, : 1984 - 1988
  • [40] An iterative identification method for linear continuous-time systems
    Campi, Marco C.
    Sugie, Toshiharu
    Sakai, Fumitoshi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2008, 53 (07) : 1661 - 1669