A Multifactorial Risk Prioritization Framework for Foodborne Pathogens

被引:51
作者
Ruzante, Juliana Martins [2 ]
Davidson, Valerie J. [1 ]
Caswell, Julie [3 ]
Fazil, Aamir
Cranfield, John A. L. [4 ]
Henson, Spencer J. [4 ]
Anders, Sven M. [5 ]
Schmidt, Claudia [4 ]
Farber, Jeffrey M.
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Maryland, Joint Inst Food Safety & Appl Nutr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Resource Econ, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[4] Univ Guelph, Dept Food Agr & Resource Econ, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[5] Univ Alberta, Dept Rural Econ, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Consumer; DALY; food safety; pathogens; public policy; risk prioritization; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; HEMOLYTIC-UREMIC SYNDROME; ESCHERICHIA-COLI O157-H7; UNITED-STATES; INFECTIONS; ILLNESS; NETHERLANDS; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01278.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We develop a prioritization framework for foodborne risks that considers public health impact as well as three other factors (market impact, consumer risk acceptance and perception, and social sensitivity). Canadian case studies are presented for six pathogen-food combinations: Campylobacter spp. in chicken; Salmonella spp. in chicken and spinach; Escherichia coli O157 in spinach and beef; and Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat meats. Public health impact is measured by disability-adjusted life years and the cost of illness. Market impact is quantified by the economic importance of the domestic market. Likert-type scales are used to capture consumer perception and acceptance of risk and social sensitivity to impacts on vulnerable consumer groups and industries. Risk ranking is facilitated through the development of a knowledge database presented in the format of info cards and the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to aggregate the four factors. Three scenarios representing different stakeholders illustrate the use of MCDA to arrive at rankings of pathogen-food combinations that reflect different criteria weights. The framework provides a flexible instrument to support policymakers in complex risk prioritization decision making when different stakeholder groups are involved and when multiple pathogen-food combinations are compared.
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 742
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
*AGR AGR CAN, CAN POULTR EGG INT T
[2]  
[Anonymous], GLOBAL BURDEN DIS RI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Societal risk assessment: Safe is safe enough?, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9]
[4]  
[Anonymous], EMERGING INFECT DIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, JDI EXECUTIVE PROGRA
[6]  
[Anonymous], Ontario Case Costing Initiative
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Life Expectancy
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RISK CHAR HDB
[9]   Can the value choices in DALYs influence global priority-setting? [J].
Arnesen, T ;
Kapiriri, L .
HEALTH POLICY, 2004, 70 (02) :137-149
[10]   Priority setting of health interventions: The need for multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Baltussen R. ;
Niessen L. .
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 4 (1)