Short-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses

被引:0
作者
Maldonado-Codina, C
Morgan, PB
Schnider, CM
Efron, N
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Optometry, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[2] Johnson & Johnson Vis Care, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
conjunctival redness; limbal redness; oxygen transmissibility; papillary conjunctivitis; soft contact lens; silicone hydrogel;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To investigate the short-term physiologic response to three soft lens materials with different oxygen permeability characteristics. Methods. Forty-three neophytes were randomly prescribed Acuvue 2, Acuvue Advance (Johnson & Johnson Vision Care), or Focus Night & Day (CIBA Vision) for 4 weeks on a daily-wear basis. A further 19 subjects did not wear lenses (control). Experimental and control subjects were examined 2 and 4 weeks after dispensing. Ocular physiologic response was measured with a slitlamp biomicroscope in a strictly masked fashion. Results. Limbal redness increased in the Acuvue 2 group compared with the other two groups. Conjunctival redness increased more in the Acuvue 2 group than in the Acuvue Advance group. More conjunctival staining was seen with the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups compared with the Acuvue 2 group. Increased scores for papillary conjunctivitis were seen in the Focus Night & Day group compared with the Acuvue Advance group. Conclusions. The reduced level of limbal redness seen with the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups suggests that these lenses provide more oxygen to the ocular surface than the Acuvue 2 lens to a degree that can be observed clinically. The conjunctival staining response was similar for the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups. The results for the Acuvue Advance and Focus Night & Day groups for papillary conjunctivitis may reflect differences in their material and surface properties.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 921
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   GIANT PAPILLARY CONJUNCTIVITIS IN CONTACT-LENS WEARERS [J].
ALLANSMITH, MR ;
KORB, DR ;
GREINER, JV ;
HENRIQUEZ, AS ;
SIMON, MA ;
FINNEMORE, VM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1977, 83 (05) :697-708
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
Benjamin W J, 1993, J Am Optom Assoc, V64, P196
[4]  
BRENNAN N, 2003, OPTOMETRY VISION SCI, V80, P185
[5]   A model of oxygen flux through contact lenses [J].
Brennan, NA .
CORNEA, 2001, 20 (01) :104-108
[6]  
BUCHNER A, 1992, PRIORI POST HOC COMP
[7]   Biological oxygen apparent transmissibility of hydrogel contact lenses with and without organosilicon moieties [J].
Compañ, V ;
López-Alemany, A ;
Riande, E ;
Refojo, MF .
BIOMATERIALS, 2004, 25 (02) :359-365
[8]  
DARK JK, 1991, LANCET, V338, P650
[9]   Diurnal variation of corneal sensitivity and thickness [J].
du Toit, R ;
Vega, JA ;
Fonn, D ;
Simpson, T .
CORNEA, 2003, 22 (03) :205-209
[10]   Vascular response to extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability [J].
Dumbleton, KA ;
Chalmers, RL ;
Richter, DB ;
Fonn, D .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2001, 78 (03) :147-151