Changes in Online Psychoactive Substance Trade via Telegram during the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:11
作者
Blankers, Matthijs [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van der Gouwe, Daan [1 ]
Stegemann, Lavinia [1 ]
Smit-Rigter, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Mental Hlth & Addict, Trimbos Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Arkin Mental Hlth Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Psychiat, Locat AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Telegram; Online drug monitoring; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1159/000516853
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In this article, we present an evaluation of online psychoactive substance trade via Telegram, a free encrypted social media messenger service. The evaluation took place during the COVID-19 pandemic, which allowed us to monitor the effects of the spring 2020 lockdown in the Netherlands on substance trade via Telegram. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether changes in psychoactive substance trade on Telegram markets in the Netherlands can be observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Between December 2, 2019, and June 29, 2020, a total of 70,226 posts appeared in two analyzed Telegram groups. A total of 5,643 posts were psychoactive substance related. Based on the analyzed posts, Telegram is mostly a '"sellers" market as only a minority of the posts (6.3%) could be identified as a request for a substance. The proportion of posts related to specific substances varied between the periods before, during, and after the lockdown. The proportion of posts on the stimulants ecstasy, cocaine, and amphetamine was lower during the lockdown than before and after. For psychedelics - ketamine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromophenethylamine (2C-B) - and other substances, there was a relative increase in the number of posts during the lockdown, which was maintained after the lockdown. Conclusions: Telegram analysis shows that in the Netherlands, online psychoactive substance trade may have been affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. The direction of this effect was different for different classes of substances.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 474
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Telegram
  • [2] No magic pocket: Buying and selling on drug cryptomarkets in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and social restrictions
    Barratt, Monica J.
    Aldridge, Judith
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2020, 83
  • [3] The Drug Information and Monitoring System (DIMS) in the Netherlands: Implementation, results, and international comparison
    Brunt, Tibor M.
    Niesink, Raymond J. M.
    [J]. DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS, 2011, 3 (09) : 621 - 634
  • [4] Croes E, 2020, JAARBERICHT NATIONAL
  • [5] EMCDDA Europol, 2020, EU DRUG MARK IMP COV
  • [6] Will the Current COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Long-term Cannabis Buying Practices?
    Groshkova, Teodora
    Stoian, Tiberiu
    Cunningham, Andrew
    Griffiths, Paul
    Singleton, Nicola
    Sedefov, Roumen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2020, 14 (04) : E13 - E14
  • [7] #Drugsforsale: An exploration of the use of social media and encrypted messaging apps to supply and access drugs
    Moyle, Leah
    Childs, Andrew
    Coomber, Ross
    Barratt, Monica J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2019, 63 : 101 - 110
  • [8] SmitRigter L., 2019, The drugs information and monitoring system (DIMS): Factsheet on drug checking in the Netherlands
  • [9] van der Gouwe D, 2020, DRUGS INFORM MONITOR
  • [10] van Laar M, 2019, ONLINE DRUG MONITORI