A phase II randomized study of topical intrarectal administration of amifostine for the prevention of acute radiation-induced rectal toxicity

被引:33
|
作者
Kouloulias, VE
Kouvaris, JR
Pissakas, G
Kokakis, JD
Antypas, C
Mallas, E
Matsopoulos, G
Michopoulos, S
Vosdoganis, SP
Kostakopoulos, A
Vlahos, LJ
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Aretaieion Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Athens, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Inst Commun & Comp Syst, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Athens, Greece
[3] YGEIA Diagnost & Therapeut Ctr, Ctr Radiat Oncol, Athens, Greece
[4] Agios Savvas Anticanc Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Athens, Greece
[5] Alexandra Gen Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Athens, Greece
[6] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Sismanoglio Hosp, Dept Urol, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
randomized; amifostine; intrarectal; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-004-1226-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the cytoprotective effect of intrarectal amifostine administration on acute radiation-induced rectal toxicity. Patients and Methods: 67 patients with T1b-2 NO MO prostate cancer were randomized to receive amifostine intrarectally (group A, n = 33) or not (group B, n = 34) before irradiation. Therapy was delivered using a four-field technique with three-dimensional conformal planning. In group A, 1,500 mg amifostine was administered intrarectatly as an aqueous solution in a 40-ml enema. Two different toxicity scales were used: EORTC/RTOG rectal and urologic toxicity criteria along with a Subjective-RectoSigmoid (S-RS) scale based on the endoscopic terminology of the World Organization for Digestive Endoscopy. Objective measurements with rectosigmoidoscopy were performed at baseline and 1-2 days after the completion of radiotherapy. The area under curve for the time course of mucositis (RTOG criteria) during irradiation represented the mucositis index (MI). Results: Intrarectal amifostine was feasible and well tolerated without any systemic or Local side effects. According to the RTOG toxicity scale, five out of 33 patients showed grade 1 mucositis in group A versus 15 out of 34 patients with grade 1/2 in group B (p = 0.026). Mean rectal MI was 0.3 +/- 0.1 in group A versus 2.2 +/- 0.4 in group B (p < 0.001), while S-RS score was 3.9 +/- 0.5 in group A versus 6.3 +/- 0.7 in group B (p < 0.001). The incidence of urinary toxicity was the same in both groups. Conclusion: Intrarectal administration of amifostine seems to have a cytoprotective efficacy in acute radiation-induced rectal mucositis. Further randomized studies are needed for definitive therapeutic decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 562
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phase II multicenter randomized study of amifostine for prevention of acute radiation rectal toxicity: Topical intrarectal versus subcutaneous application
    Kouloulias, VE
    Kouvaris, JR
    Pissakas, G
    Mallas, E
    Antypas, C
    Kokakis, JD
    Matsopoulos, G
    Michopoulos, S
    Mystakidou, K
    Vlahos, LJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (02): : 486 - 493
  • [2] Intrarectal application of amifostine for the prevention of radiation-induced rectal injury
    Ben-Josef, E
    Han, S
    Tobi, M
    Vargas, BJ
    Stamos, B
    Kelly, L
    Biggar, S
    Kaplan, I
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [3] A Phase II Randomized Study of Topical Intrarectal Administration of Amifostine for the Prevention of Acute Radiation-Induced Rectal ToxicityTopische intrarektale Verabreichung von Amifostin zur Verhinderung akuter rektaler Strahlentoxizität: eine randomisierte Phase-II-Studie
    Vassilis E. Kouloulias
    John R. Kouvaris
    George Pissakas
    John D. Kokakis
    Christos Antypas
    Elias Mallas
    George Matsopoulos
    Spyros Michopoulos
    Sofoklis-Panagiotis Vosdoganis
    Athanasios Kostakopoulos
    Lambros J. Vlahos
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2004, 180 : 557 - 562
  • [4] A pilot study of topical intrarectal application of amifostine for prevention of late radiation rectal injury
    Ben-Josef, E
    Han, S
    Tobi, M
    Shaw, LM
    Bonner, HS
    Vargas, BJ
    Prokop, S
    Stamos, B
    Kelly, L
    Biggar, S
    Kaplan, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05): : 1160 - 1164
  • [5] Prevention of radiation-induced liver and kiney toxicity: a role for amifostine
    Uguzalp-Kaldir, Mine
    Yurut-Caloglu, Vuslat
    Cosar-Alas, Rusen
    Cermik, Tevfik Fikret
    Altaner, Semsi
    Eskiocak, Sevgi
    Saynak, Mert
    Ibis, Kamuran
    Caloglu, Murat
    Tokatli, Fusun
    Kocak, Zafer
    Uzal, Cem
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 22 (03): : 105 - 117
  • [6] Prevention of radiation-induced central nervous system toxicity: A role for amifostine?
    Nieder, C
    Andratschke, NH
    Wiedenmann, N
    Molls, M
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 24 (06) : 3803 - 3809
  • [7] Topical rectal beclomethasone dipropionate treatment for the prevention of radiation-induced bleeding
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Guido, Alessandra
    GUT, 2012, 61 (09) : 1369 - 1369
  • [8] A Phase II Study to Prevent Radiation-induced Rectal Injury With Lovastatin
    Anscher, Mitchell S.
    Chang, Michael G.
    Moghanaki, Drew
    Rosu, Mihaela
    Mikkelsen, Ross B.
    Holdford, Diane
    Skinner, Vicki
    Grob, Baruch M.
    Sanyal, Arun
    Wang, Aiping
    Mukhopadhyay, Nitai D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (06): : 544 - 548
  • [9] Cytoprotective efficacy of amifostine against radiation-induced rectal toxicity: Objective and subjective grading scales for radiomucositis
    Kouloulias, Vassilis E.
    Kouvaris, John R.
    MOLECULES, 2008, 13 (04) : 892 - 903
  • [10] Effect of a Prostaglandin - Given Rectally for Prevention of Radiation-Induced Acute Proctitis - on Late Rectal Toxicity Results of a Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study
    Kertesz, Tereza
    Herrmann, Markus K. A.
    Zapf, Antonia
    Christiansen, Hans
    Hermann, Robert M.
    Pradier, Olivier
    Schmidberger, Heinz
    Hess, Clemens F.
    Hille, Andrea
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2009, 185 (09) : 596 - 602