A Comparison of Back Pain Functional Scale With Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form 36-Health Survey

被引:29
作者
Koc, Meltem [1 ]
Bayar, Banu [1 ]
Bayar, Kilichan [1 ]
机构
[1] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Mugla, Turkey
关键词
Back Pain Function Scale; comparison; correlation; evaluation; functional status; low back pain; Oswestry Disability Index; Roland Morris questionnaire; self-reported outcome measure; SF-36; REPORT OUTCOME MEASURES; TURKISH VERSION; RATING INDEX; RESPONSIVENESS; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002431
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A comparison study of Back Pain Functional Scale (BPFS) with Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form 36-Health Survey (SF-36). Objective. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation of BPFS with RMQ, ODI, and SF-36. Summary of Background Data. The primary goal in the treatment of patients with low back pain is to improve the patients' levels of activities and participation. Many questionnaires focusing on function have been developed in patients with low back pain. BPFS is one of these questionnaires. No studies have investigated the correlation of BPFS with ODI and SF-36. Methods. This study was conducted with 120 patients receiving outpatient and inpatient treatment in physiotherapy and rehabilitation units of a state hospital. BPFS, RMQ, ODI, and SF-36 questionnaires were used to assess the disability in low back pain. Spearman and Pearson Correlation were used to compare the data obtained in the study. Results. There was a good correlation among the 5 functional outcome measures (correlation r = -0.693 for BPFS/RMQ, r = -0.794 for BPFS/ODI, r = 0.697 for BPFS/SF-36 Physical function and r = 0.540 for BPFS/SF-36 Pain). Conclusion. BPFS demonstrated good correlation with RMQ, ODI, SF-36 physical function, and SF-36 pain.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 882
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain [J].
Garratt, AM ;
Moffett, JK ;
Farrin, AJ .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (01) :71-77
[12]   The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? [J].
Greenhalgh, J ;
Long, AF ;
Flynn, R .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (04) :833-843
[13]   Functional status and disability questionnaires: What do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires [J].
Grotle, M ;
Brox, JI ;
Vollestad, NK .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (01) :130-140
[14]   Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Turkish Version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire [J].
Gunaydin, Gurkan ;
Citaker, Seyit ;
Meray, Jale ;
Cobanoglu, Gamze ;
Gunaydin, Ozge Ece ;
Kanik, Zeynep Hazar .
SPINE, 2016, 41 (21) :E1292-E1297
[15]  
Haegg O., 2013, OSWESTRY DISABILITY, P2559
[16]   The patient-specific functional scale is more responsive than the Roland Morris disability questionnaire when activity limitation is low [J].
Hall, Amanda M. ;
Maher, Chris G. ;
Latimer, Jane ;
Ferreira, Manuela L. ;
Costa, Leonardo O. P. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (01) :79-86
[17]   Managing Missing Scores on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [J].
Kent, Peter ;
Lauridsen, Henrik Hein .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (22) :1878-1884
[18]  
Koc M., THESIS
[19]  
Kocyigit H., 1999, Glac ve Tedavi Dergisi, V12, P102
[20]   Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain [J].
Küçükdeveci, AA ;
Tennant, A ;
Elhan, AH ;
Niyazoglu, H .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (24) :2738-2743