A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Benefit of Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction in Early Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

被引:15
|
作者
Salazar, Aina [1 ]
Regis, Lucas [1 ,2 ]
Planas, Jacques [1 ,2 ]
Celma, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Santamaria, Anna [2 ]
Trilla, Enrique [1 ,3 ]
Morote, Juan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vall Hebron Hosp, Dept Urol & Renal Transplantat, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Vall Hebron Res Inst, Prostate Canc Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Surg Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Vall Hebron Hosp, Dept Urol & Renal Transplantat, Passeig Vall Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
Robot -assisted radical; prostatectomy; Posterior rhabdosphincter; reconstruction; Early urinary continence; recovery; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction (PRR) has been proposed to improve early urinary continence (UC) recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP). In order to generate level 1b evidence, we designed a double-blind randomised controlled trial powered to detect a 20% increase in early UC recovery after robot-assisted RP (RARP). A group of 153 patients with cT1c-3a N0M0 prostate cancer were randomised (73 to control arm and 80 to PRR arm) and 152 completed 12-mo followup. For UC defined as no pad use, the recovery hazard ratio at 1-mo follow-up was 2.312 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.081-4.937; p = 0.030). UC recovery was observed in 33.8% of patients in the PRR arm and 18.1% of patients in the control arm (p = 0.022). At 3-mo follow-up the corresponding rates were 58.8% and 43.1% (p = 0.038). The median time to UC recovery was 106 d (95% CI 73-139) in the control arm and 64 d (95% CI 39-89) in PRR arm (p = 0.897). No differences in pathological outcomes or early and late surgical complications were observed between the arms. We conclude that PRR is safe and increases early UC recovery after RARP. Patient summary: We investigated reconstruction of a muscular ring that controls the flow of urine, called the rhabdosphincter, after removal of the prostate in robotassisted surgery. The procedure is safe and increases early recovery of urinary continence. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03302169. (c) 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 463
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation and Posterior Urethral Reconstruction during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Urinary Continence
    You, Youn Chul
    Kim, Tae Hyo
    Sung, Gyung Tak
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 53 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [22] Continence outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with adverse urinary continence risk factors
    Kumar, Anup
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Bates, Anthony S.
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Patel, Vipul R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (05) : 764 - 770
  • [23] Modified hood technique for single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy contributes to early recovery of continence
    Zhang, Haoxun
    Ning, Zikuan
    Jia, Guang
    Zhang, Guoling
    Wang, Jiuliang
    Liu, Hua
    Tao, Boju
    Wang, Chunyang
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [24] Surgeon Performance Predicts Early Continence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Goldenberg, Mitchell G.
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Grantcharov, Teodor P.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (09) : 858 - 863
  • [25] Preservation of pelvic floor muscles contributes to early continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Nakamura, Masaki
    Yamada, Yuta
    Sato, Yusuke
    Honda, Kazuki
    Yamada, Daisuke
    Kawai, Taketo
    Akiyama, Yoshiyuki
    Suzuki, Motofumi
    Kume, Haruki
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [26] Surgical techniques to preserve continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Katsimperis, Stamatios
    Juliebo-Jones, Patrick
    Ta, Anthony
    Tandogdu, Zafer
    Al-Bermani, Osama
    Bellos, Themistoklis
    Esperto, Francesco
    Tonyali, Senol
    Mitsogiannis, Iraklis
    Skolarikos, Andreas
    Varkarakis, Ioannis
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    Tzelves, Lazaros
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [27] Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial
    Hurtes, Xavier
    Roupret, Morgan
    Vaessen, Christophe
    Pereira, Helder
    d'Arcier, Benjamin Faivre
    Cormier, Luc
    Bruyere, Franck
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (06) : 875 - 883
  • [28] Recovery and immune function after low pressure pneumoperitoneum during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial
    Reijnders-Boerboom, Gabby T. J. A.
    Jacobs, Lotte M. C.
    Helder, Leonie S.
    Panhuizen, Ivo F.
    Brouwer, Maik P. J.
    Albers, Kim I.
    Loonen, Tom
    Scheffer, Gert Jan
    Keijzer, Christiaan
    van Basten, Jean-Paul A.
    Warle, Michiel C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (03) : 416 - 425
  • [29] Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Critical Analysis of Techniques and Outcomes EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Menon, Mani
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (03) : 741 - 741
  • [30] Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Thomsen, Frederik Birkebek
    Hvarness, Helle
    Christensen, Ib Jarle
    Iversen, Peter
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (04) : 356 - 366