Beyond LCOE: A multi-criteria evaluation framework for offshore renewable energy projects

被引:28
作者
Vanegas-Cantarero, Maria M. [1 ]
Pennock, Shona [1 ]
Bloise-Thomaz, Tianna [1 ]
Jeffrey, Henry [1 ]
Dickson, Matthew J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Inst Energy Syst, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] CorPower Ocean AB, Vastberga Alle 60, S-12630 Hagersten, Sweden
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Multi-criteria evaluation; Offshore renewable energy; Input-output analysis; Levelised cost of energy; Lifecycle Assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DECISION-MAKING; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; SYSTEMS-APPROACH; SITE SELECTION; METHODOLOGY; WIND; TOPSIS; SUITABILITY; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112307
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The transition to low-carbon energy systems is a complex process that implies radical technological changes, greenhouse gas emission reductions, and benefits to the local economies yet, also significant investment, a need for capacity building, strengthening supply chains and supporting legal frameworks. Consequently, the choice of renewable energy technologies should be based on a comprehensive assessment addressing the different dimensions that are affected. Clean energy technologies are traditionally evaluated on the basis of their techno-economic performance. Such an approach penalises emerging energy technologies that are generally more capital-intensive given their innovation requirement and the lack of support mechanisms facilitating their industrial roll-out. In this paper, a multi-criteria evaluation framework is proposed encompassing three important broad dimensions: techno-economics, environment and socio-economics. The applicability and flexibility of the proposed evaluation framework are demonstrated on different case studies. First, the hypothetical deployment of a floating offshore wind farm both in Scotland and Portugal is evaluated. Later, the proposed framework is used to evaluate the deployments of wave energy devices in the same two locations. The results show that this multi-criteria approach provides a more holistic overview of the performance and implications of renewable energy technologies, particularly emerging ones, and can better support decision-and policy-making in the medium-and long-term. Furthermore, the framework can be used by researchers, investors, developers and/or analysts to assess energy planning alternatives.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Developing a novel risk-based methodology for multi-criteria decision making in marine renewable energy applications [J].
Abaei, Mohammad Mandi ;
Arzaghi, Ehsan ;
Abbassi, Rouzbeh ;
Garaniya, Vikram ;
Penesis, Irene .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 102 :341-348
[2]  
Abu Taha R., 2013, GREEN ENERGY TECHNOL, V60, P17, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-5097-8_2
[3]   Multi-criteria assessment of new and renewable energy power plants [J].
Afgan, NH ;
Carvalho, MG .
ENERGY, 2002, 27 (08) :739-755
[4]   Multi-criteria selection of electric power plants using analytical hierarchy process [J].
Akash, BA ;
Mamlook, R ;
Mohsen, MS .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1999, 52 (01) :29-35
[5]   A framework for the evaluation of routing protocols in opportunistic networks [J].
Akestoridis, Dimitrios-Georgios ;
Papapetrou, Evangelos .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 145 :14-28
[6]   Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia [J].
Al Garni, Hassan Z. ;
Awasthi, Anjali .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 206 :1225-1240
[7]   Impact of alternative electricity generation technologies on the Scottish economy: an illustrative input-output analysis [J].
Allan, G. ;
McGregor, P. G. ;
Swales, J. K. ;
Turner, K. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2007, 221 (A2) :243-254
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, SCOTL NAT MAR PLAN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Technical Report
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 14044 ISO