Deliberate Trust and Intuitive Faith: A Dual-Process Model of Reliance

被引:11
|
作者
Stoltz, Dustin S. [1 ]
Lizardo, Omar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Sociol, 4060 Jenkins Nanovic, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
cognition; dual process theory; faith; reliance; trust; INTEGRATIVE MODEL; CULTURAL ANALYSIS; EGO DEPLETION; UNITED-STATES; SELF-CONTROL; COGNITION; EMOTION; COOPERATION; RECIPROCITY; STRANGERS;
D O I
10.1111/jtsb.12160
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Drawing on the dual process framework from social and cognitive psychology, this paper reconciles two distinct conceptualizations of trust prevalent in the literature: rational calculative and irrational affective or normative. After critically reviewing previous attempts at reconciliation between these distinctions, we argue that the notion of trust as reliance is the higher order category of which deliberate trust and intuitive faith are subtypes. Our revised approach problematizes the conflation of epistemic uncertainty with phenomenological uncertainty while providing sound footing for a key sociological insight: that reliance on the routine social order is both the cognitive default and based on substantial practical evidence. We develop two broad suggestions for future research from these implications: (1) sociological research should examine the role of intuitive faithas opposed to deliberate trustin late modern societies, and (2) analysts should challenge the role of deliberate trust as the modal form of reliance in contemporary research.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 250
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do we need dual-process theory to understand implicit bias? A study of the nature of implicit bias against Muslims
    Bursell, Moa
    Olsson, Filip
    POETICS, 2021, 87
  • [32] Fast or Slow: Sociological Implications of Measuring Dual-Process Cognition
    Moore, Rick
    SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 4 : 196 - 223
  • [33] Associations and propositions: The case for a dual-process account of learning in humans
    McLaren, I. P. L.
    Forrest, C. L. D.
    McLaren, R. P.
    Jones, F. W.
    Aitken, M. R. F.
    Mackintosh, N. J.
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF LEARNING AND MEMORY, 2014, 108 : 185 - 195
  • [34] A Dual-Process Perspective on Fluency-Based Aesthetics: The Pleasure-Interest Model of Aesthetic Liking
    Graf, Laura K. M.
    Landwehr, Jan R.
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2015, 19 (04) : 395 - 410
  • [35] A dual-process Qualia Modeling Framework (QMF)
    Vaughan, Sandra L.
    Mills, Robert F.
    Peterson, Gilbert L.
    Grimaila, Michael R.
    Rogers, Steven K.
    Oxley, Mark E.
    Patterson, Robert E.
    BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES, 2016, 17 : 71 - 85
  • [36] The case for a dual-process theory of transitive reasoning
    Wright, Barlow C.
    DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2012, 32 (02) : 89 - 124
  • [37] Rational Misbehavior? Evaluating an Integrated Dual-Process Model of Criminal Decision Making
    van Gelder, Jean-Louis
    de Vries, Reinout E.
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [38] Examining attitudes toward bicycle-share program use: A dual-process theory approach
    Chen, Li-Hsin
    Chancellor, H. Charles
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 62 : 769 - 781
  • [39] Emotion response coherence: A dual-process perspective
    Evers, Catharine
    Hopp, Henrik
    Gross, James J.
    Fischer, Agneta H.
    Manstead, Antony S. R.
    Mauss, Iris B.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 98 : 43 - 49
  • [40] True versus strategic fairness in a common resource dilemma: Evidence from the dual-process perspective
    Lu, Su
    Au, Wing-Tung
    Zhu, Yi
    Jiang, Feng
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 32 (03) : 255 - 265