Clinicopathological risk factors and survival analysis of ovarian cancer with synchronous endometrial cancer diagnosed after surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Bakir, Mehmet Sait [1 ]
Birge, Ozer [1 ]
Karadag, Ceyda [1 ]
Dogan, Selen [1 ]
Tuncer, Hasan Aykut [1 ]
Simsek, Tayup [1 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Dept Gynecol Obstet, Div Gynecol Oncol, TR-07070 Antalya, Turkey
关键词
Synchronous epithelial ovarian cancer; Endometrial cancer; Endometriosis; Survival; PRIMARY NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; MALIGNANCIES; UTERINE; TRENDS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.31083/j.ejgo.2021.03.2336
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: In the present study, we tried to retrospectively evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis and survival of patients with synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer (SOEC). Material and methods: The data of patients with ovarian cancer who had been admitted to our hospital between February 2006 and March 2019 were retrospectively obtained from the hospital's electronic archive system collected after having obtained the ethics committee approval. Thirty-six patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and simultaneously diagnosed with primary endometrial cancer were included in the study. Patients with non-epithelial ovarian cancer, recurrent, metastatic and metachronous tumor, borderline ovarian tumor, uterine sarcoma and carcinosarcoma, and patients who had not attended regular controls were excluded from the study. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the Kaplan Meier survival analysis. The log rank test was used to test the effect of subgroups on survival. Results: The mean age of the SOEC patients included in the study was 52.05 +/- 13.46 years. Of the patients, 8.3% had endometriosis and 16.7% had concurrent adenomyosis. Optimal surgery was seen to have been performed when evaluated with regard to post-operative residual tumor (R0, R1 and R2 61.1%, 33.3% and 5.6%, respectively). The histological grade was Grade 3 in most of the patients (44.4%). When the histology of SOEC patients was examined, endometrioid type was seen to be the most frequent in 18 patients (50%), followed by the serous type in 10 patients (27.8%). The least frequent was clear histology in 2 patients (5.6%). On the other hand, with regard to the endometrial cancer histology of SOEC patients, while the most common type was endometrioid type with 27 patients (75%), serous histological type was seen in 8 patients (22.2%). The five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 43.6% for all patients, while the overall survival (OS) was 67.1%. The median PFS was 32 months, while the median OS was 89.6 months. In the subgroup analysis was performed as serous/serous histological type with SOEC patients with endometrioid/endometrioid, the median PFS was 53.8 months for the endometrioid/endometrioid type and 11.5 months for the serous/serous type, and it was statistically significant (p: 0.001). In terms of OS for both groups, it was 110.2 and 36.8 months, respectively, and it was statistically significant (p: 0.001). Conclusion: Endometrioid type endometrial cancer is more common than serous in synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer patients and serous type has a worse prognosis than endometrioid.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 505
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development and internal validation of a prognostic model for survival after debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer
    Rutten, M. J.
    Boldingh, J. H. L.
    Schuit, E.
    Trum, H.
    van Driel, W.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Kenter, G. G.
    Buist, M. R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 135 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [42] A meta-analysis of the risk factors of surgical site infection after hysterectomy for endometrial cancer
    Yang, Rong
    Wang, Lu
    Shui, Chengyu
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (02)
  • [43] A risk factor analysis of complications after surgery for vulvar cancer
    Gitas, Georgios
    Proppe, L.
    Baum, S.
    Kruggel, M.
    Rody, A.
    Tsolakidis, D.
    Zouzoulas, D.
    Lagana, A. S.
    Guenther, V.
    Freytag, D.
    Alkatout, I.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (02) : 511 - 519
  • [44] Risk reduction of endometrial and ovarian cancer after bisphosphonates use: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Xiao-san
    Zhang, Yi-ming
    Li, Bin
    Fan, Bo
    Zhao, Yan
    Yang, Shu-jun
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 150 (03) : 509 - 514
  • [45] Synchronous early-stage endometrial and ovarian cancer
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Fruscio, Robert
    Lissoni, Andrea Alberto
    Pirovano, Cecilia
    Perego, Patrizia
    Mangioni, Costantino
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 102 (01) : 34 - 38
  • [46] Risk factors of endometrial cancer in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: implication for clinical treatments
    Zhao, Jie
    Hu, Yongting
    Zhao, Yanan
    Chen, Dongmei
    Fang, Tingfeng
    Ding, Miao
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [47] Synchronous Primary Cancers of the Endometrium and Ovary With the Same Histopathologic Type Versus Endometrial Cancer With Ovarian Metastasis A Single Institution Review of 72 Cases
    Bese, Tugan
    Sal, Veysel
    Kahramanoglu, Ilker
    Tokgozoglu, Nedim
    Demirkiran, Fuat
    Turan, Hasan
    Ilvan, Sennur
    Arvas, Macit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (02) : 394 - 406
  • [48] Aspirin use and endometrial cancer risk and survival
    Takiuchi, Tsuyoshi
    Blake, Erin A.
    Matsuo, Koji
    Sood, Anil K.
    Brasky, Thedore M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (01) : 222 - 232
  • [49] Liver recurrence in endometrial cancer: a multi-institutional analysis of factors predictive of postrecurrence survival
    Toptas, Tayfun
    Karalok, Alper
    Ureyen, Isin
    Tasci, Tolga
    Erol, Onur
    Bozkurt, Selen
    Tulunay, Gokhan
    Simsek, Tayup
    Turan, Taner
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2016, 33 (07) : 707 - 715
  • [50] Synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas: predictors of risk and associations with survival and tumor expression profiles
    Kelemen, Linda E.
    Rambau, Peter F.
    Koziak, Jennifer M.
    Steed, Helen
    Kobel, Martin
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2017, 28 (05) : 447 - 457