Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising

被引:180
作者
Seiter, RP [1 ]
Kadela, KR
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Criminal Justice Program, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Dept Sociol & Criminal Justice, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
prisons; parole; prisoner reentry; halfway houses;
D O I
10.1177/0011128703049003002
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
During the past decade, there has been a renewed interest in prisoner reentry. This is due to a change in many of the factors surrounding the release of prisoners and their reentry to the community. These changes include a modification of sentencing from the use of parole to determinate release with fewer ex-offenders having supervision in the community, an increased emphasis on surveillance rather than assistance for those under supervision, less community stability and availability of community social service support, and dramatically larger numbers returning to the community. More releasees are being violated and returned to the community than ever before Therefore, it is important to identify prisoner reentry programs that work. We define reentry, categorize reentry programs, and use the Maryland Scale of Scientific Method to determine the effectiveness of program categories. We conclude that many such categories are effective in aiding reentry and reducing recidivism.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 388
页数:29
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Adams K., 1994, The Prison Journal, V74, P433, DOI DOI 10.1177/0032855594074004004
[2]  
Anderson Elijah., 1990, STREETWISE
[3]  
Andrews D., 2001, LEVEL SERVICE INVENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Prisoners in 1998
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PRISON J
[6]  
[Anonymous], J OFFENDER REHABILIT, DOI DOI 10.1300/J076V24N03_05
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Forum on Corrections Research
[8]  
Barbaree H. E., 1996, FORUM CORRECTIONS RE, V8, P13
[9]   LONGITUDINAL AND CRIMINAL CAREER RESEARCH - FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS [J].
BLUMSTEIN, A ;
COHEN, J ;
FARRINGTON, DP .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1988, 26 (01) :57-74
[10]  
*BUR JUST STAT, 1977, NAT PRIS STAT