An efficient epistemic uncertainty analysis method using evidence theory

被引:36
|
作者
Zhang, Z. [1 ]
Ruan, X. X. [1 ]
Duan, M. F. [1 ]
Jiang, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Mech & Vehicle Engn, State Key Lab Adv Design & Mfg Vehicle Body, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty analysis; Epistemic uncertainty; Evidence theory; Probability bound analysis; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; CONVEX MODEL; QUANTIFICATION; REPRESENTATIONS; APPROXIMATION; INFORMATION; PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.033
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Evidence theory is widely regarded as a promising mathematical tool for epistemic uncertainty analysis. However, the heavy computational burden has severely hindered its application in practical engineering problems, which is essentially caused by the discrete uncertainty quantification mechanism of evidence variables. In this paper, an efficient epistemic uncertainty analysis method using evidence theory is proposed, based on a probabilistic and continuous representation of the epistemic uncertainty presented in evidence variables. Firstly, each evidence variable is equivalently transformed to a Johnson p-box which is a family of Johnson distributions enveloped by the CDF bounds. Subsequently, the probability bound analysis is conducted for the input Johnson p-box and the response CDF based on monotonicity analysis. Finally, the CDF bounds of the response are directly calculated using the CDF bounds of the input Johnson p-boxes, by which a high computational efficiency is achieved for the proposed method. Two mathematical problems and two engineering applications are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 466
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty
    Nannapaneni, Saideep
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 155 : 9 - 20
  • [42] Epistemic uncertainty assessment using Incremental Dynamic Analysis and Neural Networks
    Giovanis, Dimitris G.
    Fragiadakis, Michalis
    Papadopoulos, Vissarion
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 14 (02) : 529 - 547
  • [43] Epistemic uncertainty assessment using Incremental Dynamic Analysis and Neural Networks
    Dimitris G. Giovanis
    Michalis Fragiadakis
    Vissarion Papadopoulos
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 14 : 529 - 547
  • [44] A new method of level-2 uncertainty analysis in risk assessment based on uncertainty theory
    Zhang, Qingyuan
    Kang, Rui
    Wen, Meilin
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 22 (17) : 5867 - 5877
  • [45] Comparative study of metamodeling techniques for reliability analysis using evidence theory
    Bai, Y. C.
    Han, X.
    Jiang, C.
    Liu, J.
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2012, 53 : 61 - 71
  • [46] New index for reliability sensitivity analysis under epistemic uncertainty
    Suo, Bin
    Zeng, Chao
    Cheng, Yongsheng
    Li, Shiling
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34 (07): : 1605 - 1615
  • [47] Material model uncertainty quantification using evidence theory
    Salehghaffari, S.
    Rais-Rohani, M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2013, 227 (10) : 2165 - 2181
  • [48] A response surface approach for structural reliability analysis using evidence theory
    Zhang, Z.
    Jiang, C.
    Han, X.
    Hu, Dean
    Yu, S.
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2014, 69 : 37 - 45
  • [49] Probability-interval hybrid uncertainty analysis for structures with both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties: a review
    Jiang, C.
    Zheng, J.
    Han, X.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 57 (06) : 2485 - 2502
  • [50] First and second order approximate reliability analysis methods using evidence theory
    Zhang, Z.
    Jiang, C.
    Wang, G. G.
    Han, X.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 137 : 40 - 49