Effectiveness of SurgicelA® (Fibrillar) in patients with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

被引:10
作者
Myung, Yu Sik [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ko, Bong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Han, Jae Pil [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hong, Su Jin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jeon, Seong Ran [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jin Oh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moon, Jong Ho [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Moon Sung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Ctr Digest Dis, Dept Internal Med, 1174 Jung Dong, Bucheon 420767, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ, Res Inst, 1174 Jung Dong, Bucheon 420767, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Hosp, 1174 Jung Dong, Bucheon 420767, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2016年 / 30卷 / 04期
关键词
Colorectal ESD; Complication; Surgicel; LARGE MUCOSAL DEFECTS; EPITHELIAL NEOPLASMS; TUMORS; CLOSURE; OUTCOMES; AGENTS; COLON;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-015-4369-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Because the invasive procedure of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) entails a extensive mucosal defect and submucosal exposure, the procedure may have a substantial risk of complications including delayed bleeding, perforation and bacteremia and/or endotoxemia. The aim of our study was to investigate whether Surgicel(A (R)) would be effective in reducing complications after colorectal ESD. Between 2012 and 2013, 52 consecutive patients who underwent a colorectal ESD were enrolled. After the removal of colorectal epithelial neoplasm, surgicel was sprayed onto the submucosal surface using the wet type of application (Surgicel(A (R)) group). We evaluated tumor type, location, size, histology, procedure time, hospital stay and associated complication. For assessing inflammatory reaction, white blood cells and body temperature were monitored. In assessing the effectiveness of Surgicel(A (R)) application, we retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes with 52 other consecutive large colorectal tumor patients who had previously received conventional ESD, as control group (non-Surgicel(A (R)) group). Of the 52 patients, three patients were excluded. Forty-nine patients were ultimately enrolled in this study. During the follow-up period, rebleeding occurred in 0 (0 % in Surgicel(A (R)) group) patients and 4 (7.7 % in non-Surgicel(A (R)) group) patients; fever (> 37.7) in 2 (4.1 %) and 10 (19.2 %) patients, respectively (p = 0.019); and leukocytosis in 9 (18.4 %) and 16 (30.8 %) patients, respectively (p = 0.172). C-reactive protein level was 0.35 +/- A 0.18 and 9.83 +/- A 2.44 (p < 0.001). The mean hospitalization period was 4.22 +/- A 0.94 and 5.13 +/- A 0.27 days, respectively (p < 0.001). The group (surgicel vs. non-surgicel, p = 0.005, odds ratio 11.114 (2.104-58.718)) was identified as independent predictor for complication such as fever or delayed bleeding by multivariated analysis. Surgicel(A (R)) application after colorectal ESD may be an effective method to reduce some complications and mean hospitalization period. Therefore, surgicel application may be considered to be a valuable clinical method.
引用
收藏
页码:1534 / 1541
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of counter traction using a clip with a looped thread for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Indo, Naohiko
    Anami, Takahiro
    Kitamura, Yasuaki
    Watanabe, Akihiko
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (03) : E306 - E312
  • [32] Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection vs conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms: a single-centre retrospective study
    Cecinato, P.
    Lucarini, M.
    Azzolini, F.
    Bassi, F.
    Sassatelli, R.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 27 (04) : 317 - 323
  • [33] Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Fujinami, Haruka
    Teramoto, Akira
    Takahashi, Saeko
    Ando, Takayuki
    Kajiura, Shinya
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [34] The Feasibility of Performing Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Without Previous Experience in Performing Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
    Dong-Hoon Yang
    Gwi Hong Jeong
    Yerim Song
    Sang Hyoung Park
    Soo-Kyung Park
    Jong Wook Kim
    Kee Wook Jung
    Kyung-Jo Kim
    Byong Duk Ye
    Seung-Jae Myung
    Suk-Kyun Yang
    Jin-Ho Kim
    Young Soo Park
    Jeong-Sik Byeon
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2015, 60 : 3431 - 3441
  • [35] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal cancer: is it feasible?
    Suh, Jung Pil
    Youk, Eui Gon
    Lee, Eun Jung
    Lee, Jae Bum
    Lee, In Taek
    Lee, Doo Seok
    Kim, Mi-Jung
    Lee, Suk Hee
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 25 (09) : 1051 - 1059
  • [36] High total Joule heat increases the risk of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Ochi, Masanori
    Kawagoe, Ryosuke
    Kamoshida, Toshiro
    Hamano, Yukako
    Ohkawara, Haruka
    Ohkawara, Atsushi
    Kakinoki, Nobushige
    Yamaguchi, Yuji
    Hirai, Shinji
    Yanaka, Akinori
    Tsuchiya, Kiichiro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (38) : 6442 - 6452
  • [37] CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES OF ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR COLORECTAL TUMORS
    Tanaka, Shinji
    Terasaki, Motomi
    Kanao, Hiroyuki
    Oka, Shiro
    Chayama, Kazuaki
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 24 : 73 - 79
  • [38] Management of complications related to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Gweon, Tae-Geun
    Yang, Dong-Hoon
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 56 (04) : 423 - 432
  • [39] Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Is it suitable in western countries?
    Uraoka, Toshio
    Parra-Blanco, Adolfo
    Yahagi, Naohisa
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 (03) : 406 - 414
  • [40] Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice
    Keihanian, Tara
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 14 : 317 - 330