Motion Adaptation and the Velocity Coding of Natural Scenes

被引:23
作者
Barnett, Paul D. [1 ]
Nordstroem, Karin [1 ,2 ]
O'Carroll, David C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med Sci, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Neurosci, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; OPTIC FLOW; DENDRITIC INTEGRATION; STIMULUS PARAMETERS; DESCENDING NEURON; RESPONSE LATENCY; VISUAL-SYSTEM; LOBULA PLATE; FLY; DETECTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.072
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Estimating relative velocity in the natural environment is challenging because natural scenes vary greatly in contrast and spatial structure. Widely accepted correlation-based models for elementary motion detectors (EMDs) are sensitive to contrast and spatial structure and consequently generate ambiguous estimates of velocity [1]. Identified neurons in the third optic lobe of the hoverfly can reliably encode the velocity of natural images largely independent of contrast [2], despite receiving inputs directly from arrays of such EMDs [3, 4]. This contrast invariance suggests an important role for additional neural processes in robust encoding of image motion [2, 5, 6]. However, it remains unclear which neural processes are contributing to contrast invariance. By recording from horizontal system neurons in the hoverfly lobula, we show two activity-dependent adaptation mechanisms acting as near-ideal normalizers for images of different contrasts that would otherwise produce highly variable response magnitudes. Responses to images that are initially weak neural drivers are boosted over several hundred milliseconds. Responses to images that are initially strong neural drivers are reduced over longer time scales. These adaptation mechanisms appear to be matched to higher-order natural image statistics reconciling the neurons' accurate encoding of image velocity with the inherent ambiguity of correlation-based motion detectors.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 999
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   MECHANISMS OF DENDRITIC INTEGRATION UNDERLYING GAIN-CONTROL IN FLY MOTION-SENSITIVE INTERNEURONS [J].
BORST, A ;
EGELHAAF, M ;
HAAG, J .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 2 (01) :5-18
[2]   Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission [J].
Brenner, N ;
Bialek, W ;
van Steveninck, RD .
NEURON, 2000, 26 (03) :695-702
[3]   Robust Models for Optic Flow Coding in Natural Scenes Inspired by Insect Biology [J].
Brinkworth, Russell S. A. ;
O'Carroll, David C. .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 5 (11)
[4]  
Deng J. X., 2008, IM VIS COMP NZ 23 IN, P1
[5]   Accuracy of velocity estimation by Reichardt correlators [J].
Dror, RO ;
O'Carroll, DC ;
Laughlin, SB .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2001, 18 (02) :241-252
[6]   THE CONTRAST SENSITIVITY OF FLY MOVEMENT-DETECTING NEURONS [J].
DVORAK, D ;
SRINIVASAN, MV ;
FRENCH, AS .
VISION RESEARCH, 1980, 20 (05) :397-407
[7]   Outdoor performance of a motion-sensitive neuron in the blowfly [J].
Egelhaaf, M ;
Grewe, J ;
Kern, R ;
Warzecha, AK .
VISION RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (27) :3627-3637
[8]  
Esch HE, 1996, J EXP BIOL, V199, P155
[9]   Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code [J].
Fairhall, AL ;
Lewen, GD ;
Bialek, W ;
van Steveninck, RRD .
NATURE, 2001, 412 (6849) :787-792
[10]  
Franceschini N., 1989, P360