Assessment of therapeutic response in Crohn's disease using quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters A preliminary study

被引:12
作者
Zhu, Jianguo [1 ]
Zhang, Faming [2 ]
Zhou, Jinfa [1 ]
Li, Haige [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Ctr Intestinal Dis, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
blood volume; Crohn's disease; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; therapeutic responses; vascular transfer constant; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; LIVER-TUMOR MODEL; DW-MRI; CANCER; ENTEROGRAPHY; QUANTIFICATION; ANGIOGENESIS; CHEMOTHERAPY; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000007759
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to investigate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) as a potential marker to assess the therapeutic responses of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and to determine the parameter or combination of parameters most strongly associated with changes in clinical indicators after treatment. In 22 CD patients, DCE-MRI was performed with a 3.0T scanner. Parameters of DCE-MRI (vascular transfer constant [K-tmas] and blood volume [BV]) in the terminal ileum were compared between before and day 90 after FMT treatment. The differences of clinical indicators (C-reactive protein [CRP], Harvey-Bradshaw index [HBI]) and DCE-MRI parameters (K-tmas, BV) between pre-and posttreatment was calculated by Student's 2-tailed, paired t-test. The correlations between percent change of clinical indicators (DCRP, DHBI) with DCE-MRI parameters (Delta Ktrnas, DBV) were analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficients. A logistic regression model was used to identify the changes of DCE-MRI parameters related to the treatment outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were generated to assess which DCE-MRI parameter showed the best accuracy for evaluation of therapeutic response. After treatment, mean values of clinical indicators decreased significantly (CRP: 62.68+/-31.86 vs 43.55+/-29.63 mg/L, P=. 008; HBI: 7.18+/-2.10 vs 5.73+/-2.33, P= 0.012). Both DCE-MRI parameters showed prominent differences before and after treatment: K-trans (1.86+/-0.87 vs 1.39+/-0.83 min(-1), P=. 017), BV (61.02+/-28.49 vs 41.96+/-22.75mL/100g, P=. 005). There were significant correlations between DCRP or DHBI and percent change of CDE-MRI parameters (DKtrans to DCRP: 0.659; DKtrans to DHBI: 0.496; DBV to DCRP: 0.442; DBV to DHBI: 0.476). Compared to DKtrans and DBV individually, the combination of both parameters performed best in assessment of therapeutic response with an area under the ROCs (AUC) of 0.948. K-trans and BV parameters derived from DCE-MRI have the potential to assess for therapeutic response after FMT treatment for CD. The combination of K-trans and BV measurements improved the predictive capability compared to the individual parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Polyethylene glycol and contrast-enhanced MRI of Crohn's disease in children: Preliminary experience [J].
Magnano, G ;
Granata, C ;
Barabino, A ;
Magnaguagno, F ;
Rossi, U ;
Calevo, MG ;
Toma, P .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 33 (06) :385-391
[22]   Polyethylene glycol and contrast-enhanced MRI of Crohn's disease in children: preliminary experience [J].
Gianmichele Magnano ;
Claudio Granata ;
Arrigo Barabino ;
Francesca Magnaguagno ;
Umberto Rossi ;
Maria Grazia Calevo ;
Paolo Toma .
Pediatric Radiology, 2003, 33 :385-391
[23]   Model-Based Blind Estimation of Kinetic Parameters in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI [J].
Fluckiger, Jacob U. ;
Schabel, Matthias C. ;
DiBella, Edward V. R. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (06) :1477-1486
[24]   Contrast-enhanced MRI of the small bowel in Crohn's disease [J].
Oommen, Jacob ;
Oto, Aytekin .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2011, 36 (02) :134-141
[25]   Contrast-enhanced MRI of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease [J].
Jacob Oommen ;
Aytekin Oto .
Abdominal Imaging, 2011, 36 :134-141
[26]   Assessment of neovascular permeability in a pancreatic tumor model using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with contrast agents of different molecular weights [J].
Delrue, Louke J. ;
Casneuf, Veerle ;
Van Damme, Nancy ;
Blanckaert, Peter ;
Peeters, Marc ;
Ceelen, Wim P. ;
Duyck, Philippe C. O. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (04) :225-232
[27]   MRI assessment of body composition for prediction of therapeutic response to biologic agents in patients with Crohn's disease [J].
Sakai, Naomi S. ;
Plumb, Andrew A. ;
Ahmed, Norin ;
Chowdhury, Kashfia ;
Kilic, Yakup ;
Hameed, Maira ;
Patel, Anisha ;
Bhagwanani, Anisha ;
Helbren, Emma ;
Hyland, Rachel ;
Bhatnagar, Gauraang ;
Sidhu, Harbir ;
Lambie, Hannah ;
Franklin, James M. ;
Mohsin, Maryam ;
Thomson, Elen ;
Boone, Darren ;
Tolan, Damian ;
Rahman, Safi ;
Ding, Nik ;
Moran, Gordon W. ;
Bloom, Stuart ;
Hart, Ailsa ;
Menys, Alex ;
Travis, Simon ;
Halligan, Steve ;
Taylor, Stuart A. ;
Motility Trial Investigators, Tariq .
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2025, 16 (01)
[28]   Low-Molecular Contrast Agent Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI and Diffusion-Weighted (DW)-MRI in Early Assessment of Bevacizumab Treatment in Breast Cancer Xenografts [J].
Moestue, Siver A. ;
Huuse, Else M. ;
Lindholm, Evita M. ;
Bofin, Anna ;
Engebraaten, Olav ;
Maelandsmo, Gunhild M. ;
Akslen, Lars A. ;
Gribbestad, Ingrid S. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 38 (05) :1043-1053
[29]   Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in malignant pleural mesothelioma: prediction of outcome based on DCE-MRI measurements in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy [J].
Tomsic, Martina Vivoda ;
Korosec, Peter ;
Kovac, Viljem ;
Bisdas, Sotirios ;
Popovic, Katarina Surlan .
BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
[30]   Quantitative assessment of microcirculation and diffusion in the bone marrow of osteoporotic rats using VCT, DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and histology [J].
Liu, Yifei ;
Cao, Liji ;
Hillengass, Jens ;
Delorme, Stefan ;
Schlewitz, Gudrun ;
Govindarajan, Parameswari ;
Schnettler, Reinhard ;
Heiss, Christian ;
Baeuerle, Tobias .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (02) :205-213