Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Units Dedicated to Acute Coronary Syndromes

被引:2
作者
Ferreira Azeredo-Da-Silva, Andre Luis [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Perini, Silvana [2 ]
Rigotti Soares, Pedro Henrique [2 ]
Polaczyk, Carisi Anne [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Grad Program Epidemiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Porto Alegre Clin Hosp, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Natl Inst Hlth Technol Assessment INCT IATS Brazi, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Grad Program Cardiol & Cardiovasc Sci, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Porto Alegre Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
chest pain unit; coronary care unit; systematic review; cost effectiveness; CPU; CCU; PAIN OBSERVATION UNIT; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CHEST-PAIN; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CARE-UNIT; PROTOCOL; OUTCOMES; MEDLINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: Dedicated units for the care of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been submitted to economic evaluations; however, the results have not been systematically presented. Objective: To identify and summarize economic outcomes of studies on hospital units dedicated to the initial care of patients with suspected or confirmed ACS. Methods: A systematic review of literature to identify economic evaluations of chest pain unit (CPU), coronary care unit (CCU), or equivalent units was done. Two search strategies were used: the first one to identify economic evaluations irrespective of study design, and the second one to identify randomized clinical trials that reported economic outcomes. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Costs were inflated to 2012 values. Results: Search strategies retrieved five partial economic evaluations based on observational studies, six randomized clinical trials that reported economic outcomes, and five model-based economic evaluations. Overall, cost estimates based on observational studies and randomized clinical trials reported statistically significant cost savings of more than 50% with the adoption of CPU care instead of routine hospitalization or CCU care for suspected low-to-intermediate risk patients with ACS (median per-patient cost US $1,969.89; range US $1,002.12-13,799.15). Model-based economic evaluations reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios below US $50,000/quality-adjusted life year for all comparisons between intermediate care unit, CPU, or CCU with routine hospital admissions. This finding was sensible to myocardial infarction probability. Conclusions: Published economic evaluations indicate that more intensive care is likely to be cost-effective in comparison to routine hospital admission for patients with suspected ACS.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 295
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Testing of Low-Risk Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association [J].
Amsterdam, Ezra A. ;
Kirk, J. Douglas ;
Bluemke, David A. ;
Diercks, Deborah ;
Farkouh, Michael E. ;
Garvey, J. Lee ;
Kontos, Michael C. ;
McCord, James ;
Miller, Todd D. ;
Morise, Anthony ;
Newby, L. Kristin ;
Ruberg, Frederick L. ;
Scordo, Kristine Anne ;
Thompson, Paul D. .
CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (17) :1756-1776
[2]   2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines [J].
Anderson, Jeffrey L. ;
Adams, Cynthia D. ;
Antman, Elliott M. ;
Bridges, Charles R. ;
Califf, Robert M. ;
Casey, Donald E., Jr. ;
Chavey, William E., II ;
Fesmire, Francis M. ;
Hochman, Judith S. ;
Levin, Thomas N. ;
Lincoff, A. Michael ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Theroux, Pierre ;
Wenger, Nanette Kass ;
Wright, R. Scott ;
Ettinger, Steven M. ;
Ganiats, Theodore G. ;
Jneid, Hani ;
Philippides, George J. ;
Zidar, James Patrick ;
Jacobs, Alice K. ;
Albert, Nancy ;
Hochman, Judith S. ;
Creager, Mark A. ;
Kushner, Frederick G. ;
Ohman, Erik Magnus ;
Guyton, Robert A. ;
Stevenson, William G. ;
Halperin, Jonathan L. ;
Yancy, Clyde W. .
CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (18) :E426-E579
[3]   SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: UTILITY OR FUTILITY? [J].
Anderson, Rob .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 19 (03) :350-364
[4]   Structure, process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE Trial [J].
Arnold, Jane ;
Goodacre, Steve ;
Morris, Francis .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (07) :462-466
[5]   END RESULTS, COST AND PRODUCTIVITY OF CORONARY-CARE UNITS [J].
BLOOM, BS ;
PETERSON, OL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1973, 288 (02) :72-78
[6]  
Conti A, 2005, MED SCI MONITOR, V11, pCR100
[7]   Economic evaluation in critical care medicine [J].
Cox, Heather L. ;
Laupland, Kevin B. ;
Manns, Braden J. .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 21 (02) :117-124
[8]  
CRETIN S, 1977, HEALTH SERV RES, V12, P174
[9]   Patient satisfaction with chest pain unit care: findings from the Effectiveness and Safety of Chest Pain Assessment to Prevent Emergency Admissions (ESCAPE) cluster randomised trial [J].
Cross, Elizabeth ;
Goodacre, Steve .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2010, 27 (10) :774-778
[10]   Outcomes in patients with chest pain evaluated in a chest pain unit: The Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room study cohort [J].
Cullen, Michael W. ;
Reeder, Guy S. ;
Farkouh, Michael E. ;
Kopecky, Stephen L. ;
Smars, Peter A. ;
Behrenbeck, Thomas R. ;
Allison, Thomas G. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 161 (05) :871-877