Sex differences in the response to opioids for pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:60
作者
Pisanu, Claudia [1 ]
Franconi, Flavia [2 ]
Gessa, Gian Luigi [1 ]
Mameli, Sergio [3 ]
Pisanu, Giovanni Maria [3 ]
Campesi, Ilaria [4 ]
Leggio, Lorenzo [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Agabio, Roberta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Sect Neurosci & Clin Pharmacol, Dept Biomed Sci, SS 554,Km 4-500, I-109042 Monserrato, CA, Italy
[2] Natl Inst Biostruct & Biosyst, Lab Sex Gender Med, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[3] Azienda Osped Brotzu, Pain Therapy Unit, Via Jenner snc, I-09121 Cagliari, Italy
[4] Univ Sassari, Dept Biomed Sci, Viale San Pietro 43, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[5] NIAAA, Sect Clin Psychoneuroendocrinol & Neuropsychophar, Div Intramural Clin & Basic Res, 10 Ctr Dr,10CRC-15330, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] NIDA, Intramural Res Program, NIH, 10 Ctr Dr,10CRC-15330, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] NIDA, Medicat Dev Program, Intramural Res Program, NIH, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[8] Brown Univ, Ctr Alcohol & Addict Studies, Providence, RI 02912 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Chronic pain; Acute pain; Opioids; Sex differences; Gender differences; Women; ANALGESIC RESPONSE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; MORPHINE; NALBUPHINE; WOMEN; MEN; REQUIREMENTS; ENHANCEMENT; DISORDERS; NALOXONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104447
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
There are conflicting results about sex differences in the response to opioids for pain control and the role of potential influencing factors of these differences has not been investigated. We meta-analyzed differences and similarities between men and women in opioid response for pain control and investigated the potential influence of baseline pain intensity, age, body weight, and other factors in these findings. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through January 15, 2019, for clinical studies in which opioids were administered for pain control. We included clinical studies in which (a) opioids were used to treat acute or chronic pain, (b) the response to opioids was broken down for men and women, and (c) the response to opioids was reported as (i) difference between baseline and final Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) score 30 min after opioid administration (Delta-VASPI at 30'), or daily dose of opioids (ii) self-administered by patients (patient-controlled analgesia PCA), or (iii) administered by physicians. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and the overall quality of evidence for primary outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE system. Globally, we included 40 comparisons (6794 patients). Regarding acute pain, we found moderate quality of evidence that women and men do not differ in their response to opioids 30 min after their administration [Delta-VASPI at 30': mean difference, MD = 0.42 (-0.07; 0.91)]. We also found moderate quality of evidence that women self-administer lower daily amounts of opioids [daily PCA: standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.30 (-0.41; 0.18)]. Regarding chronic pain, we found low quality of evidence that women receive lower daily doses for non-cancer pain [MD = -36.42 (-57.86; -14.99)]. By contrast, we found very low quality of evidence that women and men do not differ in the daily dose of opioids for cancer pain [MD = -16.09 (-40.13; 7.94)]. Age, comorbid mental disorders, type of administration, type of opioids, type of patients, and body weight significantly modified these results. In conclusion, the results of the present meta-analysis suggest that men and women may differ in the response to opioids for pain relief, but these differences as well as similarities are significantly influenced by factors like age and comorbid mental disorders. However, the role of these factors is not usually evaluated in the prescription of opioids for pain control. There is an urgent need to conduct clinical trials on the use of opioid medications for pain, in which information about all possible influencing factors are provided and broken down for men and women.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Sex differences in substance use disorders: focus on side effects
    Agabio, Roberta
    Campesi, Ilaria
    Pisanu, Claudia
    Gessa, Gian Luigi
    Franconi, Flavia
    [J]. ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2016, 21 (05) : 1030 - 1042
  • [2] Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations -: I:: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group -: art. no. 38
    Atkins, D
    Eccles, M
    Flottorp, S
    Guyatt, GH
    Henry, D
    Hill, S
    Liberati, A
    O'Connell, D
    Oxman, AD
    Phillips, B
    Schünemann, H
    Edejer, TTT
    Vist, GE
    Williams, JW
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2004, 4 (1)
  • [3] Coupling Policymaking with Evaluation - The Case of the Opioid Crisis
    Barnett, Michael L.
    Gray, Josh
    Zink, Anna
    Jena, Anupam B.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (24) : 2306 - 2309
  • [4] The federal plan for health science and technology's response to the opioid crisis: understanding sex and gender differences as part of the solution is overlooked
    Becker, Jill B.
    Mazure, Carolyn M.
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF SEX DIFFERENCES, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [5] Intravenous bolus of ultra-low-dose naloxone added to morphine does not enhance analgesia in emergency department patients
    Bijur, PE
    Schechter, C
    Esses, D
    Chang, AK
    Gallagher, EJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 7 (02) : 75 - 81
  • [6] Response to morphine in male and female patients: Analgesia and adverse events
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Esses, David
    Birnbaum, Adrienne
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Schechter, Clyde
    Gallagher, E. John
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 24 (03) : 192 - 198
  • [7] Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of two intravenous morphine dosages (0.10 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg) in emergency department patients with moderate to severe acute pain
    Birnbaum, Adrienne
    Esses, David
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Holden, Lynne
    Gallagher, E. John
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 49 (04) : 445 - 453
  • [9] THE INFLUENCE OF PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS ON THE REQUIREMENTS FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA - A REASSESSMENT USING PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA
    BURNS, JW
    HODSMAN, NBA
    MCLINTOCK, TTC
    GILLIES, GWA
    KENNY, GNC
    MCARDLE, CS
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [10] Campesi Ilaria, 2012, Handb Exp Pharmacol, P265, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-30726-3_13