Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Assessing Hemodynamically Significant Native Coronary Artery Lesions

被引:0
作者
Sethi, Pooja [1 ]
Panchal, Hemang B. [1 ]
Veeranki, Sreenivas P. [4 ]
Rahman, Zia Ur [1 ]
Mamudu, Hadii [3 ]
Paul, Timir K. [2 ]
机构
[1] East Tennessee State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
[2] East Tennessee State Univ, Div Cardiol, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
[3] East Tennessee State Univ, Dept Hlth Serv Management & Policy, Coll Publ Hlth, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Prevent Med & Community Hlth, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
关键词
Computed tomography angiography; Coronary artery lesion; Diagnostic accuracy; Computed tomography perfusion; Fractional flow reserve; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL BLOOD-FLOW; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; STENOSIS; INTERMEDIATE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic performance of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) with and without computed tomography angiography (CTA) in assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions in comparison to invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). Materials and Methods: PubMed and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials from January 2010 searched through December 2014. Nine original studies were selected evaluating the diagnostic performance of CTP with and without CTA to invasive coronary angiography in evaluation of hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions (n = 951). Results: The sensitivity, specificity, LR+ and LR- and DOR of CTA+CTP were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI: 0.79-0.89)] 0.94 (CI: 0.91-0.97), 15.8 (CI: 7.99-31.39), 0.146 (CI: 0.08-0.26), and 147.2 (CI: 69.77-310.66). Summary Receiver Operating Characteristics (SROC) results showed area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 indicating that CTA+CTP may detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions with high accuracy. The sensitivity, specificity, LR+ and LR- and DOR of CTP were 0.83 (CI: 0.78-0.87), 0.84 (CI: 0.80-0.87) 5.26 (CI: 2.93-9.43), 0.209 (CI: 0.12-0.36), and 31.97 (CI: 11.59-88.20). Conclusions: This result suggests that CTP with CTA significantly improves diagnostic performance of coronary artery lesions compared to CTA alone and closely comparable with invasive FFR.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Comparison of Coronary Artery Disease Consortium 1 and 2 Scores and Duke Clinical Score to Predict Obstructive Coronary Disease by Invasive Coronary Angiography
    Almeida, Joao
    Fonseca, Paulo
    Dias, Tiago
    Ladeiras-Lopes, Ricardo
    Bettencourt, Nuno
    Ribeiro, Jose
    Gama, Vasco
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 39 (04) : 223 - 228
  • [2] Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis: Incremental Diagnostic Value of Dynamic CT-based Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Becker, Alexander
    Schwarz, Florian
    Marcus, Roy P.
    Greif, Martin
    von Ziegler, Franz
    Blankstein, Ron
    Hoffmann, Udo
    Sommer, Wieland H.
    Hoffmann, Verena S.
    Johnson, Thorsten R. C.
    Becker, Hans-Christoph R.
    Wintersperger, Bernd J.
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (03) : 689 - 698
  • [3] CAD Detection in Patients With Intermediate-High Pre-Test Probability Low-Dose CT Delayed Enhancement Detects Ischemic Myocardial Scar With Moderate Accuracy But Does Not Improve Performance of a Stress-Rest CT Perfusion Protocol
    Bettencourt, Nuno
    Ferreira, Nuno Dias
    Leite, Daniel
    Carvalho, Monica
    Ferreira, Wilson da Silva
    Schuster, Andreas
    Chiribiri, Amedeo
    Leite-Moreira, Adelino
    Silva-Cardoso, Jose
    Nagel, Eike
    Gama, Vasco
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (10) : 1062 - 1071
  • [4] Direct Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Multidetector Computed Tomography Stress-Rest Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
    Bettencourt, Nuno
    Chiribiri, Amedeo
    Schuster, Andreas
    Ferreira, Nuno
    Sampaio, Francisco
    Pires-Morais, Gustavo
    Santos, Lino
    Melica, Bruno
    Rodrigues, Alberto
    Braga, Pedro
    Azevedo, Luis
    Teixeira, Madalena
    Leite-Moreira, Adelino
    Silva-Cardoso, Jose
    Nagel, Eike
    Gama, Vasco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : 1099 - 1107
  • [5] Incremental value of myocardial perfusion over coronary angiography by spectral computed tomography in patients with intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease
    Carrascos, Patricia M.
    Deviggiano, Alejandro
    Capunay, Carlos
    Campisi, Roxana
    Lopez de Munain, Marina
    Vallejos, Javier
    Tajer, Carlos
    Rodriguez-Granillo, Gaston A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 637 - 642
  • [6] Chen MY, 2015, CIRCULATION, V132
  • [7] Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: a comparison with fractional flow reserve
    Choo, Ki Seok
    Hwangbo, Lee
    Kim, June Hong
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Kim, Jeong Su
    Kim, Jun
    Chun, Kook Jin
    Jeong, Dong Wook
    Lim, Soo Jin
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (04) : 389 - 395
  • [8] Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With 320-Row Detector Computed Tomography Accurately Detects Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
    George, Richard T.
    Arbab-Zadeh, Armin
    Miller, Julie M.
    Vavere, Andrea L.
    Bengel, Frank M.
    Lardo, Albert C.
    Lima, Joao A. C.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2012, 5 (03) : 333 - 340
  • [9] Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve
    Gonzalez, Jorge A.
    Lipinski, Michael J.
    Flors, Lucia
    Shaw, Peter W.
    Kramer, Christopher M.
    Salerno, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 116 (09) : 1469 - 1478
  • [10] Groves EM, 2014, CARDIOL CLIN, V32, P405, DOI [10.1016/j.ccl.2014.04.005, 10.1016/j.hfc.2015.08.007]