Effect of simultaneous state-parameter estimation and forcing uncertainties on root-zone soil moisture for dynamic vegetation using EnKF

被引:35
|
作者
Monsivais-Huertero, Alejandro [1 ]
Graham, Wendy D. [2 ]
Judge, Jasmeet [1 ]
Agrawal, Divya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Ctr Remote Sensing, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Water Inst, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Root-zone soil moisture; SVAT-vegetation models; Ensemble Kalman Filter; LAND-SURFACE PROCESS; DATA ASSIMILATION; MODEL; CALIBRATION; RADIOMETER; MISSION; ERRORS; SMOS;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.01.011
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
In this study, an EnKF-based assimilation algorithm was implemented to estimate root-zone soil moisture (RZSM) using the coupled LSP-DSSAT model during a growing season of corn. Experiments using both synthetic and field observations were conducted to understand effects of simultaneous state-parameter estimation, spatial and temporal update frequency, and forcing uncertainties on RZSM estimates. Estimating the state-parameters simultaneously with every 3-day assimilation of volumetric soil moisture (VSM) observations at 5 depths lowered the average standard deviation (ASD) and the root mean square error (RMSE) for RZSM by approximately 1.77% VSM (78%) and 2.18% VSM (93%), respectively, compared to the open-loop ASD where as estimating only states lowered the ASD by approximately 1.26% VSM (56%) and the RMSE by 1.66% VSM (71%). The synthetic case obtained RZSM estimates closer to the observations than the MicroWEX-2 case, particularly after precipitation/irrigation events. The differences in EnKF performance between MicroWEX-2 and synthetic observations may indicate other sources of errors in addition to those in parameters and forcings, such as errors in model biophysics. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 484
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] The Sensitivity of North American Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Spatial and Temporal Variation in Soil Moisture: An Analysis Using Radar-Derived Estimates of Root-Zone Soil Moisture
    Zhang, Ke
    Ali, Ashehad
    Antonarakis, Alexander
    Moghaddam, Mahta
    Saatchi, Sassan
    Tabatabaeenejad, Alireza
    Chen, Richard
    Jaruwatanadilok, Sermsak
    Cuenca, Richard
    Crow, Wade T.
    Moorcroft, Paul
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2019, 124 (11) : 3208 - 3231
  • [32] High-Resolution SMAP-Derived Root-Zone Soil Moisture Using an Exponential Filter Model Calibrated per Land Cover Type
    Stefan, Vivien-Georgiana
    Indrio, Gianfranco
    Escorihuela, Maria-Jose
    Quintana-Segui, Pere
    Villar, Josep Maria
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [33] Digital Mapping of Root-Zone Soil Moisture Using UAV-Based Multispectral Data in a Kiwifruit Orchard of Northwest China
    Zhu, Shidan
    Cui, Ningbo
    Zhou, Ji
    Xue, Jingyuan
    Wang, Zhihui
    Wu, Zongjun
    Wang, Mingjun
    Deng, Qingling
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [34] Extension of cosmic-ray neutron probe measurement depth for improving field scale root-zone soil moisture estimation by coupling with representative in-situ sensors
    Hoang Hai Nguyen
    Jeong, Jaehwan
    Choi, Minha
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 571 : 679 - 696
  • [35] Enhanced Estimation of Root Zone Soil Moisture at 1 km Resolution Using SMAR Model and MODIS-Based Downscaled AMSR2 Soil Moisture Data
    Farokhi, Maedeh
    Faridani, Farid
    Lasaponara, Rosa
    Ansari, Hossein
    Faridhosseini, Alireza
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (15)
  • [36] Uncertainty estimation for a new exponential-filter-based long-term root-zone soil moisture dataset from Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) surface observations
    Pasik, Adam
    Gruber, Alexander
    Preimesberger, Wolfgang
    De Santis, Domenico
    Dorigo, Wouter
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 16 (17) : 4957 - 4976
  • [37] Estimation of root zone soil moisture using passive microwave remote sensing: A case study for rice and wheat crops for three states in the Indo-Gangetic basin
    Sure, Anudeep
    Dikshit, Onkar
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 234 : 75 - 89