Identification of appropriate risk analysis techniques for railway turnout systems

被引:32
作者
Dindar, Serdar [1 ]
Kaewunruen, Sakdirat [1 ]
An, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Civil Engn, Fac Engn, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
risk analysis; turnout systems; risk monitoring and management; rail infrastructure; system thinking approach; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; MANAGEMENT; MATRICES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2016.1264452
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The construction of railway turnout entails a complex geometry and multi-disciplinary engineering science, which makes it one of the most critical railway infrastructures. As such, these characteristics pose various risks in rail operation. A considerable number of derailment incidents at the turnouts are reported annually worldwide. Not only do these incidents cause operational downtime and financial loss, they also give rise to casualties and sometimes loss of life. One of the fundamental reasons for this may well be the fact that the railway industry pays little attention to the risk elements of railway turnouts. The paper provides an integrated approach of how to deal with the many different risks arising from various sources in railway turnout systems by suitably identifying the multi-disciplinary risk analysis methods for the complex systems. In order to do so, available open literatures are critically analysed by virtue of comparison, industry experiences and deductions. As a result, various qualitative- and quantitative-based risk analysis methods are proposed to fully understand a number of technical phenomena, e.g. ageing, degradation and signalling faults, in a railway turnout system.
引用
收藏
页码:974 / 995
页数:22
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Alexander C., 2006, J EXT, V44, P25
[2]   A fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process based approach to the process of railway risk information: A railway risk management system [J].
An, Min ;
Chen, Yao ;
Baker, Chris J. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2011, 181 (18) :3946-3966
[3]   Event-tree analysis using binary decision diagrams [J].
Andrews, JD ;
Dunnett, SJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2000, 49 (02) :230-238
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Bayesian Data Analysis
[5]  
[Anonymous], HAZARD ANAL TECHNIQU
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ACCIDENT ANAL HAZARD
[7]   A risk-based approach to sanitary sewer pipe asset management [J].
Baah, Kelly ;
Dubey, Brajesh ;
Harvey, Richard ;
McBean, Edward .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 505 :1011-1017
[8]  
Beale C. J., 2006, UNCERTAINTY RISK ASS
[9]  
Bian K., 2015, HAZARD OPERABILITY A, DOI [10.1061/9780784479384, DOI 10.1061/9780784479384]
[10]   A SYSTEM STATE TRANSITION SAMPLING METHOD FOR COMPOSITE SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION [J].
BILLINTON, R ;
LI, W .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1993, 8 (03) :761-770