Survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for T1-3N0M0 stage esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Shao, Yue [1 ]
Chen, Dan [1 ]
Ye, Liu [2 ]
Wang, Xin-Mei [3 ]
Wu, Qing-Chen [1 ]
Zhang, Cheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 1 Youyi Rd, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Branch 1, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal cancer (EC); perioperative chemotherapy; cancer-specific survival (CSS); overall survival (OS); SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; THORACIC ESOPHAGUS; SURGERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; MICROMETASTASIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21037/jtd-20-2877
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The effect of perioperative chemotherapy on patients with lymph node-negative esophageal cancer (EC) is controversial. This study explored which EC patients, staged under the T1-3N0M0, would benefit from perioperative chemotherapy. Methods: Data on patients with diagnosed primary EC were retrieved from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) method was performed to balance baseline covariates. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to assess potential survival difference between patients undergoing surgery plus perioperative chemotherapy (SA + CT) and those undergoing surgery alone (SA). Results: In a total of 2,711 EC patients (T1-3N0M0), 166 patients underwent SA + CT and 2,545 patients received SA. In the multivariable analysis, T stage was significantly related to prognosis of EC patients before and after matching. Subgroup analysis showed that perioperative chemotherapy was associated with poor cancer-specific survival (CSS) for stage T1 patients. There was no effect of perioperative chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) or CSS for T2 patients, whereas a remarkable improvement in OS and CSS was observed for T3 patients. Survival analysis showed that T3 stage EC patients obtained survival benefit from SA + CT. Prognosis in the SA group was significantly better than in the SA + CT group for T1 patients. However, T2 patients showed no significant increase in survival after undergoing SA + CT compared with SA. Conclusions: T3 patients benefit more from SA + CT. However, perioperative chemotherapy does not present survival benefit to T1-2 patients, and it is an adverse prognostic factor for T1 patients.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1004
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison Between Radical Esophagectomy and Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Clinical T1bN0M0 Esophageal Cancer
    Motoori, Masaaki
    Yano, Masahiko
    Ishihara, Ryu
    Yamamoto, Sachiko
    Kawaguchi, Yoshifumi
    Tanaka, Koji
    Kishi, Kentaro
    Miyashiro, Isao
    Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
    Shingai, Tatsushi
    Noura, Shingo
    Ohue, Masayuki
    Ohigashi, Hiroaki
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Ishikawa, Osamu
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (07) : 2135 - 2141
  • [42] Clinical fate of T0N1 esophageal cancer: results from the National Cancer Database
    Takahashi, Caitlin
    Shridhar, Ravi
    Huston, Jamie
    Meredith, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (05) : 880 - 886
  • [43] Does neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy improve overall survival for T2N0 gastric adenocarcinoma?
    Gabriel, Emmanuel
    Attwood, Kristopher
    Narayanan, Sumana
    Brady, Maureen
    Nurkin, Steven
    Hochwald, Steven
    Kukar, Moshim
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 117 (04) : 659 - 670
  • [44] Effect of preoperative radiotherapy on the prognosis of patients with stage cTxN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: propensity score matching analysis based on SEER database
    Jin, Zixian
    Sun, Jiajing
    Zhang, Jian
    Shen, Jianfei
    Zhang, Bo
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [45] Survival Outcomes in Patients with T2N0M0 (Stage II) Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx
    Gainor, Danielle L.
    Marchiano, Emily
    Bellile, Emily
    Spector, Matthew E.
    Taylor, Jeremy M. G.
    Wolf, Gregory T.
    Hogikyan, Norman D.
    Prince, Mark E.
    Bradford, Carol R.
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Worden, Francis
    Shuman, Andrew G.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 157 (04) : 625 - 630
  • [46] Induction chemotherapy for T3N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer increases the rate of complete resection but does not confer improved survival
    Anderson, Kevin L., Jr.
    Mulvihill, Michael S.
    Yerokun, Babatunde A.
    Speicher, Paul J.
    D'Amico, Thomas A.
    Tong, Betty C.
    Berry, Mark F.
    Hartwig, Andmatthew G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (02) : 370 - 377
  • [47] Comparison of different treatment strategies for T3N1-3 stage gastric cancer based on the SEER database
    Tan, Yimei
    Liu, Shuanghua
    Tao, Shaohong
    Cheng, Hui
    Huang, Menghe
    Tang, Qizhi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [48] Definitive chemoradiation therapy or surgery for clinical T1-3N0-1M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis
    Li, Xu-Yuan
    Luo, He-San
    Wu, Sheng-Xi
    Du, Ze-Sen
    Zheng, Chun-Peng
    Wu, Zhi-Yong
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 42 (01) : 350 - 355
  • [49] Treatment-related determinants of survival in early-stage (T1-2N0M0) oral cavity cancer: A population-based study
    Sowder, Justin C.
    Cannon, Richard B.
    Buchmann, Luke O.
    Hunt, Jason P.
    Hitchcock, Ying
    Lloyd, Shane
    Grossmann, Kenneth F.
    Monroe, Marcus M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2017, 39 (05): : 876 - 880
  • [50] Conservative surgery for T2>3 cm, T3 N0N1 M0 breast cancer after induction chemotherapy
    Bobin, JY
    Zinzindohoue, C
    Virelizier, CF
    Joulai, A
    Khaled, M
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2001, 88 (02) : 175 - 180