Survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for T1-3N0M0 stage esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Shao, Yue [1 ]
Chen, Dan [1 ]
Ye, Liu [2 ]
Wang, Xin-Mei [3 ]
Wu, Qing-Chen [1 ]
Zhang, Cheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 1 Youyi Rd, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Branch 1, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Esophageal cancer (EC); perioperative chemotherapy; cancer-specific survival (CSS); overall survival (OS); SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; THORACIC ESOPHAGUS; SURGERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; MICROMETASTASIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21037/jtd-20-2877
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The effect of perioperative chemotherapy on patients with lymph node-negative esophageal cancer (EC) is controversial. This study explored which EC patients, staged under the T1-3N0M0, would benefit from perioperative chemotherapy. Methods: Data on patients with diagnosed primary EC were retrieved from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) method was performed to balance baseline covariates. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to assess potential survival difference between patients undergoing surgery plus perioperative chemotherapy (SA + CT) and those undergoing surgery alone (SA). Results: In a total of 2,711 EC patients (T1-3N0M0), 166 patients underwent SA + CT and 2,545 patients received SA. In the multivariable analysis, T stage was significantly related to prognosis of EC patients before and after matching. Subgroup analysis showed that perioperative chemotherapy was associated with poor cancer-specific survival (CSS) for stage T1 patients. There was no effect of perioperative chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) or CSS for T2 patients, whereas a remarkable improvement in OS and CSS was observed for T3 patients. Survival analysis showed that T3 stage EC patients obtained survival benefit from SA + CT. Prognosis in the SA group was significantly better than in the SA + CT group for T1 patients. However, T2 patients showed no significant increase in survival after undergoing SA + CT compared with SA. Conclusions: T3 patients benefit more from SA + CT. However, perioperative chemotherapy does not present survival benefit to T1-2 patients, and it is an adverse prognostic factor for T1 patients.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1004
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adjuvant treatment patterns for pT3N0M0 esophageal cancer undergoing surgery
    Pei, Su
    Huang, Jiang-Qiong
    Liang, Huan-Wei
    Liu, Yang
    Chen, Long
    Yu, Bin-Bin
    Huang, Wei
    Pan, Xin-Bin
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 37 (08)
  • [22] Is There Any Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for T3N0M0 or T1N2M0 Gastric Cancer Patients in Stage II in the 7th TNM but Stage I in the 6th TNM System?
    Lee, Kyung-Goo
    Lee, Hyuk-Joon
    Oh, Seung-Young
    Yang, Jun-Young
    Ahn, Hye-Seong
    Suh, Yun-Suhk
    Kong, Seong-Ho
    Kim, Tae-Yong
    Oh, Do-Youn
    Im, Seock-Ah
    Lee, Kuhn Uk
    Kim, Woo Ho
    Bang, Yung-Jue
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 1234 - 1243
  • [23] Postoperative Chemotherapy for Thoracic Pathological T3N0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Kam, Audrey E.
    Pappas, Sam G.
    Masood, Ashiq
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 1314 - 1315
  • [24] Influence of adverse effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the prognosis of patients with early-stage esophageal cancer (cT1b-cT2N0M0) based on the SEER database
    Cao, Xiying
    Wu, Bingqun
    Li, Hui
    Xiong, Jianxian
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [25] Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for T4M0 esophageal cancer
    Miura, Akinori
    Honda, Michitaka
    Izumi, Yousuke
    Kato, Tsuyoshi
    Ryoutokuji, Tairo
    Kuga, Gencho
    Karasawa, Katsuyuki
    Momma, Kumiko
    Fujiwara, Junko
    Egashira, Hideto
    Yoshida, Misao
    ESOPHAGUS, 2011, 8 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [26] Surgery alone versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer
    Lin, Yan
    Wang, Shou-Feng
    Liang, Huan-Wei
    Liu, Yang
    Huang, Wei
    Pan, Xin-Bin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [27] Clinical T2N0M0 Esophageal CancerdIs Treatment Pathway Associated With Overall Survival?
    Ma, Wanyan
    Nuckles, Brandon
    Frank, Katie
    Young, Katelyn A.
    Hoffman, Rebecca L.
    Blansfield, Joseph A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 283 : 205 - 216
  • [28] The nonsurgical management of early stage (T1/2 N0 M0) laryngeal cancer: A population analysis
    Lee, Kevin C.
    Chuang, Sung-Kiang
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 130 (01): : 18 - 24
  • [29] Induction therapy for clinical stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lv, Hong-Wei
    Xing, Wen-Qun
    Shen, Si-Ning
    Cheng, Ji-Wei
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [30] Determination of the Irradiation Field for Clinical T1-T3N0M0 Thoracic/Abdominal Esophageal Cancer Based on the Postoperative Pathological Results
    Nakamura, Tatsuya
    Hatooka, Syunzo
    Kodaira, Takeshi
    Tachibana, Hiroyuki
    Tomita, Natsuo
    Nakahara, Rie
    Inokuchi, Haruo
    Mizoguchi, Nobutaka
    Takada, Akinori
    Shinoda, Masayuki
    Fuwa, Nobukazu
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 39 (02) : 86 - 91