Noxious Stimulation Response Index A Novel Anesthetic State Index Based on Hypnotic-Opioid Interaction

被引:44
作者
Luginbuehl, Martin [1 ]
Schumacher, Peter M. [1 ]
Vuilleumier, Pascal [1 ]
Vereecke, Hugo [1 ]
Heyse, Bjoern [1 ]
Bouillon, Thomas W. [1 ]
Struys, Michel M. R. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Anesthesiol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
BISPECTRAL INDEX; PHARMACODYNAMIC INTERACTION; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; SKIN-CONDUCTANCE; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL; PHARMACOKINETICS; RESPONSIVENESS; INTUBATION; ENTROPY;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d40368
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The noxious stimulation response index (NSRI) is a novel anesthetic depth index ranging between 100 and 0, computed from hypnotic and opioid effect-site concentrations using a hierarchical interaction model. The authors validated the NSRI on previously published data. Methods: The data encompassed 44 women, American Society of Anesthesiology class I, randomly allocated to three groups receiving remifentanil infusions targeting 0, 2, and 4 ng/ml. Propofol was given at stepwise increasing effect-site target concentrations. At each concentration, the observer assessment of alertness and sedation score, the response to eyelash and tetanic stimulation of the forearm, the bispectral index (BIS), and the acoustic evoked potential index (AAI) were recorded. The authors computed the NSRI for each stimulation and calculated the prediction probabilities (P(kappa)s) using a bootstrap technique. The P(kappa)s of the different predictors were compared with multiple pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Results: The median (95% CI) PK of the NSRI, BIS, and AAI for loss of response to tetanic stimulation was 0.87 (0.75-0.96), 0.73 (0.58-0.85), and 0.70 (0.54-0.84), respectively. The PK of effect-site propofol concentration, BIS, and AAI for observer assessment of alertness and sedation score and loss of eyelash reflex were between 0.86 (0.80-0.92) and 0.92 (0.83-0.99), whereas the P(kappa)s of NSRI were 0.77 (0.68-0.85) and 0.82 (0.68-0.92). The PK of the NSRI for BIS and AAI was 0.66 (0.58-0.73) and 0.63 (0.55-0.70), respectively. Conclusion: The NSRI conveys information that better predicts the analgesic component of anesthesia than AAI, BIS, or predicted propofol or remifentanil concentrations. Prospective validation studies in the clinical setting are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 880
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bouillon T. W., 2008, V182, P471, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74806-9_22
[2]   Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy [J].
Bouillon, TW ;
Bruhn, J ;
Radulescu, L ;
Andresen, C ;
Shafer, TJ ;
Cohane, C ;
Shafer, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (06) :1353-1372
[3]   Skin conductance or entropy for detection of non-noxious stimulation during different clinical levels of sedation [J].
Gjerstad, A. C. ;
Storm, H. ;
Hagen, R. ;
Huiku, M. ;
Qvigstad, E. ;
Raeder, J. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 51 (01) :1-7
[4]   Comparison of skin conductance with entropy during intubation, tetanic stimulation and emergence from general anaesthesia [J].
Gjerstad, A. C. ;
Storm, H. ;
Hagen, R. ;
Huiku, M. ;
Qvigstad, E. ;
Raeder, J. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 51 (01) :8-15
[5]   Assessment of surgical stress during general anaesthesia [J].
Huiku, M. ;
Uutela, K. ;
van Gils, M. ;
Korhonen, I. ;
Kymalainen, M. ;
Merilainen, P. ;
Paloheimo, M. ;
Rantanen, M. ;
Takala, P. ;
Viertio-Oja, H. ;
Yli-Hankala, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 98 (04) :447-455
[6]   Opioid-hypnotic synergy - A response surface analysis of propofol-Remifentanil pharmacodynamic interaction in volunteers [J].
Kern, SE ;
Xie, GM ;
White, JL ;
Egan, TD .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (06) :1373-1381
[7]   Heart rate variability does not discriminate between different levels of haemodynamic responsiveness during surgical anaesthesia [J].
Luginbuehl, M. ;
Ypparila-Wolters, H. ;
Ruefenacht, M. ;
Petersen-Felix, S. ;
Korhonen, I. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 98 (06) :728-736
[8]   Stimulation induced variability of pulse plethysmography does not discriminate responsiveness to intubation [J].
Luginbühl, M ;
Rüfenacht, M ;
Korhonen, I ;
Gils, M ;
Jakob, S ;
Petersen-Felix, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 96 (03) :323-329
[9]   Prediction of the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation:: comparison of laser-Doppler skin vasomotor reflex and pulse wave reflex [J].
Luginbühl, M ;
Reichlin, F ;
Sigurdsson, GH ;
Zbinden, AM ;
Petersen-Felix, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 89 (03) :389-397
[10]  
MERTENS MJ, 2003, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V59, P20