Mechanism design;
Psychological games;
Social preferences;
Reciprocity;
SOCIAL PREFERENCES;
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION;
RECIPROCITY;
FAIRNESS;
INCENTIVES;
AUCTIONS;
PARTNERSHIP;
FOUNDATIONS;
COMPETITION;
EQUITY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jet.2016.02.013
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
We introduce intention-based social preferences into mechanism design. We explore information structures that differ with respect to what is commonly known about the weight that agents attach to reciprocal kindness. When the designer has no information on reciprocity types, implementability of an incentive compatible social choice function is guaranteed if it satisfies an additional insurance property. By contrast, precise information on reciprocity types may imply that all efficient social choice functions are implementable. We show how these results extend to a two-dimensional mechanism design setting where the agents have private information about their material payoff types and their reciprocity types. We also provide a systematic account of the welfare implications of intentionality. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机构:
Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USAStanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
Akbarpour, Mohammad
Kominers, Scott Duke
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Harvard Univ, Harvard Business Sch, Dept Econ, Entrepreneurial Management Unit, Cambridge, MA USA
A16z crypto, Silicon Valley, CA USAStanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
Kominers, Scott Duke
Li, Kevin Michael
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA USAStanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
Li, Kevin Michael
Li, Shengwu
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA USAStanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
Li, Shengwu
Milgrom, Paul
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Stanford Univ & Auct, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA USAStanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA