Mechanism design and intentions

被引:22
|
作者
Bierbrauer, Felix [1 ,2 ]
Netzer, Nick [3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Res Collect Goods, Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Ctr Macroecon Res, Albertus Magnus Pl, D-50923 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich, Dept Econ, Bluemlisalpstr 10, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Mechanism design; Psychological games; Social preferences; Reciprocity; SOCIAL PREFERENCES; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; RECIPROCITY; FAIRNESS; INCENTIVES; AUCTIONS; PARTNERSHIP; FOUNDATIONS; COMPETITION; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2016.02.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We introduce intention-based social preferences into mechanism design. We explore information structures that differ with respect to what is commonly known about the weight that agents attach to reciprocal kindness. When the designer has no information on reciprocity types, implementability of an incentive compatible social choice function is guaranteed if it satisfies an additional insurance property. By contrast, precise information on reciprocity types may imply that all efficient social choice functions are implementable. We show how these results extend to a two-dimensional mechanism design setting where the agents have private information about their material payoff types and their reciprocity types. We also provide a systematic account of the welfare implications of intentionality. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 603
页数:47
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust mechanism design and social preferences
    Bierbrauer, Felix
    Ockenfels, Axel
    Pollak, Andreas
    Rueckert, Desiree
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2017, 149 : 59 - 80
  • [2] EXPLAINING GIFT-EXCHANGE-THE LIMITS OF GOOD INTENTIONS
    Netzer, Nick
    Schmutzler, Armin
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2014, 12 (06) : 1586 - 1616
  • [3] Intentions under cover - Hiding intentions is considered unfair
    Friehe, Tim
    Utikal, Verena
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 73 : 11 - 21
  • [4] How to be kind? Outcomes versus intentions as determinants of fairness
    Stanca, Luca
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 106 (01) : 19 - 21
  • [5] Ex post renegotiation-proof mechanism design
    Neeman, Zvika
    Pavlov, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2013, 148 (02) : 473 - 501
  • [6] Are benevolent dictators altruistic in groups? A within-subject design
    Ackert, Lucy F.
    Gillette, Ann B.
    Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge
    Rider, Mark
    EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 14 (03) : 307 - 321
  • [7] Why did he do that? Using counterfactuals to study the effect of intentions in extensive form games
    Engler, Yola
    Kerschbamer, Rudolf
    Page, Lionel
    EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (01) : 1 - 26
  • [8] Robustness in Mechanism Design and Contracting
    Carroll, Gabriel
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 11, 2019, 2019, 11 : 139 - 166
  • [9] Niccolo Machiavelli and the Origins of Mechanism Design
    Bowles, Samuel
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2014, 48 (02) : 267 - 276
  • [10] A Mechanism Design Approach to the Tiebout Hypothesis
    Jehiel, Philippe
    Lamy, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2018, 126 (02) : 735 - 760