Mechanism design;
Psychological games;
Social preferences;
Reciprocity;
SOCIAL PREFERENCES;
INCOMPLETE INFORMATION;
RECIPROCITY;
FAIRNESS;
INCENTIVES;
AUCTIONS;
PARTNERSHIP;
FOUNDATIONS;
COMPETITION;
EQUITY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jet.2016.02.013
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
We introduce intention-based social preferences into mechanism design. We explore information structures that differ with respect to what is commonly known about the weight that agents attach to reciprocal kindness. When the designer has no information on reciprocity types, implementability of an incentive compatible social choice function is guaranteed if it satisfies an additional insurance property. By contrast, precise information on reciprocity types may imply that all efficient social choice functions are implementable. We show how these results extend to a two-dimensional mechanism design setting where the agents have private information about their material payoff types and their reciprocity types. We also provide a systematic account of the welfare implications of intentionality. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机构:
Kennesaw State Univ, Michael J Coles Coll Business, Dept Econ & Finance, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
Fed Reserve Bank Atlanta, Res Dept, Atlanta, GA 30309 USAKennesaw State Univ, Michael J Coles Coll Business, Dept Econ & Finance, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
Ackert, Lucy F.
Gillette, Ann B.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Kennesaw State Univ, Michael J Coles Coll Business, Dept Econ & Finance, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
Gillette, Ann B.
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Georgia State Univ, Andrew Young Sch Policy Studies, Dept Econ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USAKennesaw State Univ, Michael J Coles Coll Business, Dept Econ & Finance, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge
Rider, Mark
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Kennesaw State Univ, Michael J Coles Coll Business, Dept Econ & Finance, Kennesaw, GA 30144 USA