A comparison of the PAI and MMPI-2 as predictors of faking bad in college students

被引:37
作者
Blanchard, DD
McGrath, RE
Pogge, DL
Khadivi, A
机构
[1] Fairleigh Dickinson Univ, Sch Psychol, Rutherford, NJ 07070 USA
[2] Fairleigh Dickinson Univ, Sch Psychol, Katonah, NY USA
[3] Four Winds Hosp, Katonah, NY USA
[4] Bronx Lebanon Hosp Ctr, Bronx, NY 10456 USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/S15327752JPA8002_08
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Both the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, 2 (MMPI-2; Butcher et al., 2001) and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 1991) offer a large set of scales devoted to the identification of response styles. This study directly compared the effectiveness of the 2 inventories as indicators of overreporting. The 2 measures were administered to 52 college students instructed to fake bad under conditions describing either a forensic (n = 24) or psychiatric (n = 28) setting as well as to 432 psychiatric patients. Results indicated that the MMPI-2 F - K index and Fp Scale were the best single indicators of a faking bad response style and that the MMPI-2 scales were the better indicators as a set. However, the PAI scales demonstrated a significant level of incremental validity over the MMPI-2 indicators in every analysis conducted. The findings suggest that either inventory offers an effective approach to the detection of overreporting, and administering both inventories can enhance the accuracy of prediction further.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 205
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J CONSULT PSYCHOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Assessment, DOI DOI 10.1177/107319119400100302
[3]   An MMPI-2 infrequent response scale for use with psychopathological populations: The infrequency-psychopathology scale, F(p) [J].
Arbisi, PA ;
BenPorath, YS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (04) :424-431
[4]   The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Nicholson, RA ;
Bacchiochi, JR ;
Ryder, AG ;
Bury, AS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2002, 78 (01) :69-86
[5]   DETECTION OF MALINGERING ON THE MMPI - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BERRY, DTR ;
BAER, RA ;
HARRIS, MJ .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1991, 11 (05) :585-598
[6]  
BERRY DTR, 1995, APPL PSY-INDIV SOC, V2, P82
[7]   Methodological problems and issues in MMPI, MMPI-2, and MMPI-A research [J].
Butcher, JN ;
Graham, JR ;
BenPorath, YS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :320-329
[8]  
Butcher JN, 2001, Mmpi-2: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation
[9]   Feigning combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder on the personality assessment inventory [J].
Calhoun, PS ;
Earnst, KS ;
Tucker, DD ;
Kirby, AC ;
Beckham, JC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2000, 75 (02) :338-350
[10]  
Cashel ML., 1995, ASSESSMENT, V2, P333, DOI DOI 10.1177/1073191195002004004