CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment:: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial

被引:150
作者
Ösby, E
Hagberg, H
Kvaloy, S
Teerenhovi, L
Anderson, H
Cavallin-Ståhl, E
Holte, H
Myhre, J
Pertovaara, H
Björkholm, M
机构
[1] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Med, Div Hematol, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Acad Hosp, Dept Oncol, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Det Norske Radiumhosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Lund Univ, Dept Canc Epidemiol, Lund, Sweden
[6] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Oncol, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[7] Rigshosp, Finsen Ctr, Dept Hematol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Tampere, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1182/blood-2002-10-3238
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) during induction chemotherapy with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone) or CNOP (doxorubicin replaced with mitoxantrone) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) improves time to treatment failure (TTF), complete remission (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the efficacy of CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy was compared. A total of 455 previously untreated patients older than 60 years with stages 11 to IV aggressive NHL were included-in the analysis. Patients (median age, 71 years; range, 60-86 years) were randomized to receive CHOP (doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2)) or CNOP (mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2)) with or without G-CSIF (5 mug/kg from day 2 until day 10-14 of each cycle every 3 weeks; 8 cycles). Forty-seven patients previously hospitalized for class I to 11 congestive heart failure were randomized to receive CNOP with or without G-CSF (not included in the CHOP versus CNOP analysis). The CR rates in the CHOP/CNOP plus G-CSF and CHOP/CNOP groups were the same, 52%, and in the CHOP with or without G-CSF and CNOP with or without G-CSF groups, 60% and 43% (P < .001), respectively. No benefit of G-CSF in terms of TTF and OS could be shown (P = .96 and P = .22, respectively), whereas CHOP was superior to CNOP (TTF/OS P < .001). The incidences of severe granulocytopenia (World Health Organization grade IV) and granulocytopenic infections were higher in patients not receiving G-CSF The cumulative proportion of patients receiving 90% or more of allocated chemotherapy was higher (P < .05) in patients receiving G-CSF. Concomitant G-CSF treatment did not improve CR rate, TTF, or OS. Patients receiving CHOP fared better than those given CNOP chemotherapy. The addition of G-CSF reduces the incidence of severe granulocytopenia and infections in elderly patients with aggressive NHL receiving CHOP or CNOP chemotherapy. (C) 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
引用
收藏
页码:3840 / 3848
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]  
MERK K, 1991, EUR J HAEMATOL, V46, P33
[32]  
Ösby E, 2001, MED ONCOL, V18, P137
[33]   Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in induction treatment of children with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A randomized study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology [J].
Patte, C ;
Laplanche, A ;
Bertozzi, AI ;
Baruchel, A ;
Frappaz, D ;
Schmitt, C ;
Mechinaud, F ;
Nelken, B ;
Boutard, P ;
Michon, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) :441-448
[34]   DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS REQUIRING PROLONGED OBSERVATION OF EACH PATIENT .2. ANALYSIS AND EXAMPLES [J].
PETO, R ;
PIKE, MC ;
ARMITAGE, P ;
BRESLOW, NE ;
COX, DR ;
HOWARD, SV ;
MANTEL, N ;
MCPHERSON, K ;
PETO, J ;
SMITH, PG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1977, 35 (01) :1-39
[35]  
PETTENGELL R, 1992, BLOOD, V80, P1430
[36]  
Pfreundschuh MG, 2001, BLOOD, V98, p725A
[37]   A PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR AGGRESSIVE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA [J].
SHIPP, MA ;
HARRINGTON, DP ;
ANDERSON, JR ;
ARMITAGE, JO ;
BONADONNA, G ;
BRITTINGER, G ;
CABANILLAS, F ;
CANELLOS, GP ;
COIFFIER, B ;
CONNORS, JM ;
COWAN, RA ;
CROWTHER, D ;
DAHLBERG, S ;
ENGELHARD, M ;
FISHER, RI ;
GISSELBRECHT, C ;
HORNING, SJ ;
LEPAGE, E ;
LISTER, TA ;
MEERWALDT, JH ;
MONTSERRAT, E ;
NISSEN, NI ;
OKEN, MM ;
PETERSON, BA ;
TONDINI, C ;
VELASQUEZ, WA ;
YEAP, BY .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (14) :987-994
[38]   COMPARISON OF DOXORUBICIN AND MITOXANTRONE IN THE TREATMENT OF ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED DIFFUSE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA USING CHOP VERSUS CNOP CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
SONNEVELD, P ;
DERIDDER, M ;
VANDERLELIE, H ;
NIEUWENHUIS, K ;
SCHOUTEN, HL ;
MULDER, A ;
VANREIJSWOUD, I ;
HOP, W ;
LOWENBERG, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (10) :2530-2539
[39]  
STANSFELD AG, 1988, LANCET, V1, P292
[40]   RISK-FACTORS FOR DOXORUBICIN-INDUCED CONGESTIVE HEART-FAILURE [J].
VONHOFF, DD ;
LAYARD, MW ;
BASA, P ;
DAVIS, HL ;
VONHOFF, AL ;
ROZENCWEIG, M ;
MUGGIA, FM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1979, 91 (05) :710-717