The Current Use of Impella 2.5 in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Results from the USpella Registry

被引:295
作者
O'Neill, William W. [1 ]
Schreiber, Theodore [2 ]
Wohns, David H. W. [3 ]
Rihal, Charanjit [4 ]
Naidu, Srihari S. [5 ]
Civitello, Andrew B. [6 ]
Dixon, Simon R. [7 ]
Massaro, Joseph M. [8 ]
Maini, Brijeshwar [9 ]
Ohman, E. Magnus [10 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Spectrum Hlth, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Winthrop Univ Hosp, Mineola, NY 11501 USA
[6] Texas Heart Inst, Houston, TX 77025 USA
[7] Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI USA
[8] Harvard Res Inst, Boston, MA USA
[9] Pinnacle Hlth Med Ctr, Wormleysburg, PA USA
[10] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
关键词
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; LEFT-VENTRICULAR SUPPORT; REVASCULARIZATION; SURVIVAL; TRENDS; DEVICE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/joic.12080
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the periprocedural characteristics and outcomes of patients supported with Impella 2.5 prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (pre-PCI) versus those who received it after PCI (post-PCI) in the setting of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background: Early mechanical circulatory support may improve outcome in the setting of CS complicating an AMI. However, the optimal timing to initiate hemodynamic support has not been well characterized. Methods: Data from 154 consecutive patients who underwent PCI and Impella 2.5 support from 38 US hospitals participating in the USpella Registry were included in our study. The primary end-point was survival to discharge. Secondary end-points included assessment of patients' hemodynamics and in-hospital complications. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors for mortality. Results: Both groups were comparable except for diabetes (P = 0.02), peripheral vascular disease (P = 0.008), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.05), and prior stroke (P = 0.04), all of which were more prevalent in the pre-PCI group. Patients in the pre-PCI group had more lesions (P = 0.006) and vessels (P = 0.01) treated. These patients had also significantly better survival to discharge compared to patients in the post-PCI group (65.1% vs. 40.7%, P = 0.003). Survival remained favorable for the pre-PCI group after adjusting for potential confounding variables. Initiation of support prior to PCI with Impella 2.5 was an independent predictor of in-hospital survival (Odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.79, P = 0.01) in multivariate analysis. The incidence of in-hospital complications included in the secondary end-point was similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that early initiation of hemodynamic support prior to PCI with Impella 2.5 is associated with more complete revascularization and improved survival in the setting of refractory CS complicating an AMI.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: The Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience [J].
Engstrom, Annemarie E. ;
Cocchieri, Ricardo ;
Driessen, Antoine H. ;
Sjauw, Krischan D. ;
Vis, Marije M. ;
Baan, Jan ;
de Jong, Mark ;
Lagrand, Wim K. ;
van der Sloot, Jos A. P. ;
Tijssen, Jan G. ;
de Winter, Robbert J. ;
de Mol, Bas A. S. ;
Piek, Jan J. ;
Henriques, Jose P. J. M. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (09) :2072-2079
[2]   Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction A Population-Based Perspective [J].
Goldberg, Robert J. ;
Spencer, Frederick A. ;
Gore, Joel M. ;
Lessard, Darleen ;
Yarzebski, Jorge .
CIRCULATION, 2009, 119 (09) :1211-1219
[3]   Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5 [J].
Henriques, JPS ;
Remmelink, M ;
Baan, J ;
van der Schaaf, RJ ;
Vis, MM ;
Koch, KT ;
Scholten, EW ;
de Mol, BAJM ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Piek, JJ ;
de Winter, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 97 (07) :990-992
[4]   The Ability to Achieve Complete Revascularization Is Associated with Improved In-hospital Survival in Cardiogenic Shock due to Myocardial Infarction: Manitoba Cardiogenic Shock Registry Investigators [J].
Hussain, Farrukh ;
Philipp, Roger K. ;
Ducas, Robin A. ;
Elliott, Jason ;
Dzavik, Vladimir ;
Jassal, Davinder S. ;
Tam, James W. ;
Roberts, Daniel ;
Garber, Philip J. ;
Ducas, John .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 78 (04) :540-548
[5]   Ten-Year Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock [J].
Jeger, Raban V. ;
Radovanovic, Dragana ;
Hunziker, Patrick R. ;
Pfisterer, Matthias E. ;
Stauffer, Jean-Christophe ;
Erne, Paul ;
Urban, Philip .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (09) :618-+
[6]   Percutaneous Left-Ventricular Support With the Impella-2.5-Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock Results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-Registry [J].
Lauten, Alexander ;
Engstrom, Annemarie E. ;
Jung, Christian ;
Empen, Klaus ;
Erne, Paul ;
Cook, Stephane ;
Windecker, Stephan ;
Bergmann, Martin W. ;
Klingenberg, Roland ;
Luescher, Thomas F. ;
Haude, Michael ;
Rulands, Dierk ;
Butter, Christian ;
Ullman, Bengt ;
Hellgren, Laila ;
Modena, Maria Grazia ;
Pedrazzini, Giovanni ;
Henriques, Jose P. S. ;
Figulla, Hans R. ;
Ferrari, Markus .
CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2013, 6 (01) :23-30
[7]   2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions [J].
Levine, Glenn N. ;
Bates, Eric R. ;
Blankenship, James C. ;
Bailey, Steven R. ;
Bittl, John A. ;
Cercek, Bojan ;
Chambers, Charles E. ;
Ellis, Stephen G. ;
Guyton, Robert A. ;
Hollenberg, Steven M. ;
Khot, Umesh N. ;
Lange, Richard A. ;
Mauri, Laura ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Moussa, Issam D. ;
Mukherjee, Debabrata ;
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. ;
Ting, Henry H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (24) :E44-E122
[8]   A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The PROTECT II Study [J].
O'Neill, William W. ;
Kleiman, Neal S. ;
Moses, Jeffrey ;
Henriques, Jose P. S. ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Massaro, Joseph ;
Palacios, Igor ;
Maini, Brijeshwar ;
Mulukutla, Suresh ;
Dzavik, Vladimir ;
Popma, Jeffrey ;
Douglas, Pamela S. ;
Ohman, Magnus .
CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (14) :1717-+
[9]   HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON COUNTERPULSATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION COMPLICATED BY CARDIOGENIC SHOCK: THE PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED IABP SHOCK TRIAL [J].
Prondzinsky, Roland ;
Unverzagt, Susanne ;
Russ, Martin ;
Lemm, Henning ;
Swyter, Michael ;
Wegener, Nikolas ;
Buerke, Ute ;
Raaz, Uwe ;
Ebelt, Henning ;
Schlitt, Axel ;
Heinroth, Konstantin ;
Haerting, Johannes ;
Werdan, Karl ;
Buerke, Michael .
SHOCK, 2012, 37 (04) :378-384
[10]   The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: A comprehensive meta-analysis [J].
Romeo, Francesco ;
Acconcia, Maria Cristina ;
Sergi, Domenico ;
Romeo, Alessia ;
Muscoli, Saverio ;
Valente, Serafina ;
Gensini, Gian Franco ;
Chiarotti, Flavia ;
Caretta, Quintilio .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 165 (05) :679-692