Polymorphisms Influencing Prostate-Specific Antigen Concentration May Bias Genome-Wide Association Studies on Prostate Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Dluzniewski, Paul J. [1 ]
Xu, Jianfeng [2 ,3 ]
Ruczinski, Ingo [4 ]
Isaacs, William B. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Platz, Elizabeth A. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Ctr Canc Genom, Winston Salem, NC USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Ctr Genom & Personalized Med Res, Winston Salem, NC USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
WINNERS CURSE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS; ANDROGEN RECEPTOR; RISK; MORTALITY; MEN; SUSCEPTIBILITY; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTION; VARIANTS;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0863
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have produced weak (OR = 1.1-1.5) but significant associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and prostate cancer. However, these associations may be explained by detection bias caused by SNPs influencing PSA concentration. Thus, in a simulation study, we quantified the extent of bias in the association between a SNP and prostate cancer when the SNP influences PSA concentration. Methods: We generated 2,000 replicate cohorts of 20,000 men using real-world estimates of prostate cancer risk, prevalence of carrying = 1 minor allele, PSA concentration, and the influence of a SNP on PSA concentration. We modeled risk ratios (RR) of 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50 for the association between carrying 1 minor allele and prostate cancer. We calculated mean betas from the replicate cohorts and quantified bias under each scenario. Results: Assuming no association between a SNP and prostate cancer, the estimated mean bias in betas ranged from 0.02 to 0.10 for ln PSA being 0.05 to 0.20 ng/mL higher in minor allele carriers; the mean biased RRs ranged from 1.03 to 1.11. Assuming true RRs 1.25 and 1.50, the biased RRs were as large as 1.39 and 1.67, respectively. Conclusion: Estimates of the association between SNPs and prostate cancer can be biased to the magnitude observed in published GWAS, possibly resulting in type I error. However, large associations (RR > 1.10) may not fully be explained by this bias. Impact: The influence of SNPs on PSA concentration should be considered when interpreting results from GWAS on prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(1); 88-93. 2014 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 93
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen on a Baseline Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Including Genetic Risk
    Kader, A. Karim
    Liss, Michael A.
    Trottier, Greg
    Kim, Seong-Tae
    Sun, Jielin
    Zheng, S. Lilly
    Chadwick, Karen
    Lockwood, Gina
    Xu, Jianfeng
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (01) : 165 - 170
  • [22] Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test
    Bell, Neil
    Gorber, Sarah Connor
    Shane, Amanda
    Joffres, Michel
    Singh, Harminder
    Dickinson, James
    Shaw, Elizabeth
    Dunfield, Lesley
    Tonelli, Marcello
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (16) : 1225 - 1234
  • [23] Trajectories of prostate-specific antigen after treatment for prostate cancer
    Wu, Ziyue
    Aslan, Mihaela
    Lin, Haiqun
    Ko, John
    Radhakrishnan, Krishnan
    Wells, Carolyn K.
    Uchio, Edward
    Concato, John
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (04) : 768 - 772
  • [24] Post genome-wide association studies functional characterization of prostate cancer risk loci
    Jiang, Junfeng
    Cui, Weirong
    Vongsangnak, Wanwipa
    Hu, Guang
    Shen, Bairong
    BMC GENOMICS, 2013, 14
  • [25] The Relationship Between Vitamin D Gene Polymorphisms and the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with High Prostate-Specific Antigen Value
    Akgul, Murat
    Uren, Nihal
    Yaman, Ali
    Baykan, Ozgur
    Ergul, Emel
    Haklar, Goncagul
    Tinay, Ilker
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2020, 19 (04): : 191 - 195
  • [26] An Empirical Evaluation of Guidelines on Prostate-specific Antigen Velocity in Prostate Cancer Detection
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Till, Cathee
    Tangen, Catherine M.
    Lilja, Hans
    Thompson, Ian M.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (06) : 462 - 469
  • [27] The relationship between diabetes, prostate-specific antigen screening tests, and prostate cancer
    Miller, Eric A.
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Pierre-Victor, Dudith
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (10) : 907 - 914
  • [28] Updated Japanese Urological Association Guidelines on prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer in 2010
    Naito, Seiji
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Okuyama, Akihiko
    Imamura, Tomoaki
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    Akaza, Hideyuki
    Hinotsu, Shiro
    Arai, Yoichi
    Dokiya, Takushi
    Egawa, Shin
    Suzuki, Kazuhiro
    Koga, Hirofumi
    Masumori, Naoya
    Akakura, Koichiro
    Kawashima, Kiyotaka
    Okihara, Koji
    Ito, Kazuto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (10) : 830 - 838
  • [29] Prostate Cancer Screening and Determining the Appropriate Prostate-Specific Antigen Cutoff Values
    Catalona, William J.
    Loeb, Stacy
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2010, 8 (02): : 265 - 270
  • [30] Prostate-specific antigen testing across the spectrum of prostate cancer
    Haythorn, Mark R.
    Ablin, Richard J.
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 5 (04) : 515 - 526