A COMPARATIVE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF MARINE DESOX SYSTEMS

被引:0
作者
Cui, Mengqi [1 ]
Lu, Yingwei [2 ]
He, Jiahao [1 ]
Ji, Lei [1 ]
Wang, Hui [1 ]
Liu, Shaojun [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, 2 Mengxi Rd, Zhenjiang 212003, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Zheda Rd, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
life cycle assessment; desulphurization; 3E model; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.2478/pomr-2021-0010
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
With new sulphur oxides emission limits carried out in 2020, multiple desulphurisation methods have been proposed. The main desulphurisation scrubber systems were chosen and investigated using life cycle assessment. The whole system life is divided into the construction and operational phases. Three different systems classified by desulphurisers, namely, seawater, NaOH, and Mg-based systems, were modelled in GaBi software. Moreover, environmental, economic and energy aspects (3E model) were introduced for further analysis. Through this study, some conclusions have been drawn. As for the environmental aspect, the seawater system has the most pleasing performance since the primary emissions come from 1.24E+03 kg CO2 and 1.48E+01 kg chloride. The NaOH system causes 1000 times more emissions than the seawater. The Mg-based system has less pollution than the NaOH system, with 5.86E+06kg CO2 and 3.86E+03 kg chloride. The economic aspect is divided into capital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx) to estimate disbursement. The seawater system also has the most favourable cost appearance, which takes 1.7 million dollars without extra desulphuriser expenses, based on 10MW engine flue gas treatment. The next is the Mg-based system, which cost 2 million dollars in CapEx and $ 1200/year in OpEx for the desulphuriser. NaOH uses about 2.5 million dollars for construction and $ 30000/year in desulphuriser. As for the energy aspect, the seawater and Mg-based systems use less non-renewable energy than the NaOH system in the construction phase. In conclusion, the seawater system shows the best performance and could be an alternative in SOx control technologies. This study sheds light on the comprehensive evaluation of marine environmental protection technologies for further optimisation.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 115
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Crop Systems Irrigated with the Groundwater and Reclaimed Water in Northern China
    Romeiko, Xiaobo Xue
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10)
  • [42] Comparative life cycle assessment of current and future electricity generation systems in the Czech Republic and Poland
    Burchart-Korol, Dorota
    Pustejovska, Pavlina
    Blaut, Agata
    Jursova, Simona
    Korol, Jerzy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (11) : 2165 - 2177
  • [43] Life Cycle Assessment of Marine Power System's Green Design
    Wang R.
    Chen Z.
    Ming X.
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2020, 54 (03): : 256 - 264
  • [44] Naturalness as a basis for incorporating marine biodiversity into life cycle assessment of seafood
    Anna K. Farmery
    Sarah Jennings
    Caleb Gardner
    Reg A. Watson
    Bridget S. Green
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1571 - 1587
  • [45] A comparative assessment of microbial biodiesel and its life cycle analysis
    Sriee, A. E. Swathe
    Sharma, Yamini
    Ranjitha, J.
    Shankar, Vijayalakshmi
    FOLIA MICROBIOLOGICA, 2024, 69 (03) : 521 - 547
  • [46] A sustainable alternative? A comparative life cycle assessment of epoxy adhesives
    Anastasiou, Dimitrios E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2023, 140 (48)
  • [47] A comparative study on life cycle assessment of micro and macro components
    Omidvarnia, F.
    Islam, A.
    Hansen, H. N.
    Olsen, S. I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 67 (5-8) : 1171 - 1189
  • [48] Comparative life cycle assessment of regional electricity supplies in China
    Ding, Ning
    Liu, Jingru
    Yang, Jianxin
    Yang, Dong
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 119 : 47 - 59
  • [49] Comparative life cycle assessment of 2.0 MW wind turbines
    Haapala, K.R. (karl.haapala@oregonstate.edu), 1600, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (03): : 170 - 185
  • [50] Comparative life cycle assessment of beneficial applications for scrap tires
    Fiksel, Joseph
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    Baral, Anil
    Guerra, Erika
    DeQuervain, Bernhard
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2011, 13 (01) : 19 - 35