Quasi-Monte Carlo method for calculating X-ray scatter in CT

被引:4
作者
Lin, Guiyuan [1 ]
Deng, Shiwo [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiaoqun [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Math Sci, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Normal Univ, Sch Math Sci, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Normal Univ, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Imaging Theory & Technol, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
DOSE CALCULATION; SIMULATION; EFFICIENT; DIMENSION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1364/OE.422534
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
In this paper we transform the trajectories of X-ray as it interacts with a phantom into a high-dimensional integration problem and give the integral formula for the probability of photons emitted from the X-ray source through the phantom to reach the detector. We propose a superior algorithm called gQMCFRD, which combines GPU-based quasi-Monte Carlo (gQMC) method with forced random detection (FRD) technique to simulate this integral. QMC simulation is deterministic versions of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, which uses deterministic low discrepancy points (such as Sobol' points) instead of the random points. By using the QMC and FRD technique, the gQMCFRD greatly increases the simulation convergence rate and efficiency. We benchmark gQMCFRD, GPU based MC tool (gMCDRR), which performs conventional simulations, a GPU-based Metropolis MC tool (gMMC), which uses the Metropolis-Hasting algorithm to sample the entire photon path from the X-ray source to the detector and gMCFRD, that uses random points for sampling against PENELOPE subroutines: MC-GPU. The results are in excellent agreement and the Efficiency Improvement Factor range 27 similar to 37 (or 1.09 similar to 1.16, or 0.12 similar to 0.15, or 3.62 similar to 3.70) by gQMCFRD (or gMCDRR, or gMMC, or gMCFRD) with comparison to MC-GPU in all cases. It shows that gQMCFRD is more effective in these cases. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:13746 / 13763
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An efficient quasi-Monte Carlo method with forced fixed detection for photon scatter simulation in CT
    Lin, Guiyuan
    Deng, Shiwo
    Wang, Xiaoqun
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [2] Langevin Quasi-Monte Carlo
    Liu, Sifan
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,
  • [3] On Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo for Matrix Computations
    Alexandrov, Vassil
    Davila, Diego
    Esquivel-Flores, Oscar
    Karaivanova, Aneta
    Gurov, Todor
    Atanassov, Emanouil
    LARGE-SCALE SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, LSSC 2017, 2018, 10665 : 249 - 257
  • [4] A review of Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo sampling techniques
    Hung, Ying-Chao
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [5] A Quasi-Monte Carlo Method for Optimal Control Under Uncertainty
    Guth, Philipp A.
    Kaarnioja, Vesa
    Kuo, Frances Y.
    Schillings, Claudia
    Sloan, Ian H.
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2021, 9 (02) : 354 - 383
  • [6] RANDOMIZED QUASI-MONTE CARLO FOR QUANTILE ESTIMATION
    Kaplan, Zachary T.
    Li, Yajuan
    Nakayama, Marvin K.
    Tuffin, Bruno
    2019 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2019, : 428 - 439
  • [7] Hybrid Quasi-Monte Carlo Method for the Simulation of State Space Models
    Morohosi, Hozumi
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ITS APPLICATIONS: IN ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 14 : 83 - 88
  • [8] Density Estimation by Randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo
    Abdellah, Amal Ben
    L'Ecuyer, Pierre
    Owen, Art B.
    Puchhammer, Florian
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2021, 9 (01) : 280 - 301
  • [9] Variance reduction for generalized likelihood ratio method by conditional Monte Carlo and randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo methods
    Peng, Yijie
    Fu, Michael C.
    Hu, Jiaqiao
    L'Ecuyer, Pierre
    Tuffin, Bruno
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 7 (04) : 550 - 577
  • [10] QUANTILE ESTIMATION VIA A COMBINATION OF CONDITIONAL MONTE CARLO AND RANDOMIZED QUASI-MONTE CARLO
    Nakayama, Marvin K.
    Kaplan, Zachary T.
    Li, Yajuan
    Tuffin, Bruno
    L'Ecuyer, Pierre
    2020 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2020, : 301 - 312