Validation of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate-II (PACSLAC-II) in Iranian older adults with dementia living in nursing homes

被引:5
|
作者
Haghi, Marjan [1 ]
Fadayevatan, Reza [1 ]
Alizadeh-khoei, Mahtab [3 ]
Kaboudi, Bijan [4 ]
Foroughan, Mahshid [1 ]
Mahdavi, Behrouz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Dept Aging, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Dept Nursing, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Clin Gerontol & Geriatr Dept, Sch Med, Poursina Ave,Engelab St, Tehran, Iran
[4] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Imam Ali Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Kermanshah, Iran
关键词
aged; pain; Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate-II; pain measurement; psychometrics; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; ELDERLY-PEOPLE; CLINICAL-USEFULNESS; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; VALIDITY; SCALE; INVENTORY; VERSION; RELIABILITY; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1111/psyg.12496
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background Some dementia patients can self-report pain although the reports are not valid in severe dementia. Observational scales have been developed for pain assessment in these patients. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate-II (PACSLAC-II). Methods This validation study was conducted on 138 older adults with dementia suffering from chronic pain who lived in nursing homes. The PACSLAC-II Persian version was applied through observations during activity and rest. Reliability of the PACSLAC-II was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficients. Construct validity was determined by confirmatory factor analysis, divergent and convergent validity. The Spearman's rank correlation between PACSLAC-II scores and Faces Pain Scale was calculated for concurrent validity. Known-group validity during activity and rest was calculated by Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Results Cronbach's alpha coefficient for facial expression (0.82), verbalisation (0.72), and body movement (0.84) subscales indicated good internal consistency. The intra-class correlation coefficients between two raters was 0.76 and in three times evaluation, the value was 0.76. Convergent validity with Iranian Brief Pain Inventory and divergent validity with 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale confirmed the construct validity of PACSLAC-II. Three factors structure of PACSLAC-II was approved, and most of the variance was explained by facial expressions. The PACSLAC-II can discriminate between pain and non-pain events and has a moderate correlation with Faces Pain Scale (r = 0.33). Conclusions PACSLAC-II Persian version is a valid and reliable scale for pain assessment in older adults with dementia.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 287
页数:10
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Evidence-based Development and Initial Validation of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors With Limited Ability to Communicate-II (PACSLAC-II)
    Chan, Sarah
    Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas
    Williams, Jaime
    Lints-Martindale, Amanda
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 30 (09) : 816 - 824
  • [2] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC-T)
    Buyukturan, Oznur
    Buyukturan, Buket
    Yetis, Aysu
    Naharci, Mehmet Ilkin
    Kirdi, Nuray
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 48 (04) : 805 - 810
  • [3] A Comparison of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC) and Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD)
    Natavio, Teofanes
    McQuillen, Elizabeth
    Dietrich, Mary S.
    Wells, Nancy
    Rhoten, Bethany A.
    Vallerand, April Hazard
    Monroe, Todd B.
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2020, 21 (06) : 502 - 509
  • [4] An Item Response Theory-Based Assessment of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors With Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC)
    Pannerden, Stephanie C. van Nispen Tot
    Candel, Math J. J. M.
    Zwakhalen, Sandra M. G.
    Hamers, Jan P. H.
    Curfs, Leopold M. G.
    Berger, Martijn P. F.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 10 (08) : 844 - 853