The bare metaphysical possibility of bare dispositions (causal basis)

被引:0
作者
McKitrick, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Many philosophers hold that all dispositions must have independent causal bases. I challenge this view, hence defending the possibility of bare dispositions. In part 1, I explain more fully what I mean by 'disposition', 'causal basis', and 'bare disposition'. In part 2, I consider the claim that the concept of a disposition entails that dispositions are not bare. In part 3, I consider arguments, due to Prior, Pargetter, and Jackson, that dispositions necessarily have distinct causal bases. In part 4, I consider arguments by Smith and Stoljar that there can't be bare dispositions because they would make for unwelcome 'barely true' counterfactuals. In the end, I find no reason to deny the possibility of bare dispositions.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 369
页数:21
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1986, HIS PHILOS PAPERS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, DISPOSITIONS DEBATE
  • [3] Armstrong D., 1973, BELIEF TRUTH KNOWLED
  • [4] BLACKBURN S, 1990, ANALYSIS, V50, P60
  • [5] Evans G., 1976, TRUTH MEANING
  • [6] EVANS G, 1980, PHILOS SUBJECTS ESSA, P76
  • [7] Evans G., 1985, COLLECT PAPERS
  • [8] Goodman N., 1983, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast
  • [9] Dispositions all the way round
    Holton, R
    [J]. ANALYSIS, 1999, 59 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [10] JACKSON F, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V59, P253