Overview of Educational Research from Turkey Published in International Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis

被引:25
作者
Gulmez, Deniz [1 ]
Ozteke, Irem [1 ]
Gumus, Sedat [2 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Ahmet Kelesoglu Fac Educ, Dept Educ Sci, Konya, Turkey
[2] Aarhus Univ, Fac Arts, Dept Educ Sociol, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE | 2021年 / 46卷 / 206期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bibliometric; Citation analysis; Co-author analysis; Co-citation analysis; Co-word analysis; Educational research; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH TRENDS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CO-AUTHORSHIP; SCIENCE; FIELD; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; TURKISH; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.15390/EB.2020.9317
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to examine educational research from Turkey published in international education journals with bibliometric analysis method. For this purpose, the documents published in journals covered by the Web of Science's (WoS) SSCI, SCI-Expanded and AHCI indexes were reached. A total of 6312 articles were included in the analysis after the necessary exclusion criteria were applied for elimination. Descriptive analysis and bibliometric analysis methods were used to analyze the data. According to the analysis that are conducted based on the WoS citations of the reviewed articles, it is seen that the authors who work in the fields of educational technology and science education stand out in terms of productivity and impact. In terms of the institutions where the authors work, Hacettepe University ranked first regarding the number of articles and Middle East Technical University ranked first regarding the number of citations. According to the co-author analysis of institutions, it is seen that state universities that are based in Ankara form strong co-authorship ties with each other and with other Anatolian universities. Four major clusters emerged in the co-citation (author) analysis. The cluster located in the center of the map mostly consists of researchers working on research methods. The other dense cluster is seen to be composed of researchers focusing on educational psychology, measurement and evaluation, and statistics. It is seen that the third big cluster consists of researchers working on topics of self-regulation, motivation, self-efficacy, goal and achievement orientation and the fourth cluster consists of researchers working in the field of science education. The concepts that become apparent in the clusters emerged from the co-word analysis are student, education, attitude, technology, achievement, performance, science education, efficacy, teacher and knowledge. It is recommended that more detailed reviews of specific fields or subjects identified in this study should be carried out by field experts.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 239
页数:27
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]   Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis [J].
Acedo, Francisco Jose ;
Barroso, Carmen ;
Casanueva, Cristobal ;
Galan, Jose Luis .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (05) :957-983
[2]  
Aktamis H., 2016, Journal of Turkish Science Education, V13, P248
[3]  
Al U., 2004, Bilgi Dnyas, V5, P19, DOI [10.15612/BD.2004.497, DOI 10.15612/BD.2004.497]
[4]  
Al U., 2006, BILGI DUNYASI, V7, P181
[5]  
Al U, 2007, TURK LIBRARIANSH, V21, P142
[6]  
Albayrak E., 2017, ULUSLARARASI TURK EG, V9, P258
[7]  
Alkan I., 2017, Dicle Universitesi Ziya Gokalp Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, V32, P865, DOI DOI 10.14582/DUZGEF.1853
[8]  
Alkan V, 2017, YILDIZ J ED RES, V2, P1
[9]  
Alper A, 2009, TURK ONLINE J EDUC T, V8, P124
[10]  
Altunay E, 2017, BALIKESIR U SOSYAL B, V20, P19