Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management

被引:144
作者
Nyberg, J. Brian
Marcot, Bruce G.
Sulyma, Randy
机构
[1] British Columbia Minist Forests & Range, Forest Practices Branch, Victoria, BC V8W 9C2, Canada
[2] USDA Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, Portland, OR 97205 USA
[3] Resource Interface Ltd, Ft St James, BC V0J 1P0, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE | 2006年 / 36卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/X06-108
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Bayesian belief and decision networks are modelling techniques that are well suited to adaptive-management applications, but they appear not to have been widely used in adaptive management to date. Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) can serve many purposes, from illustrating a conceptual understanding of system relations to calculating joint probabilities for decision options and predicting outcomes of management policies. We describe the nature and capabilities of BBNs, discuss their applications to the adaptive-management process, and present a case example of adaptive management of forests and terrestrial lichens in north-central British Columbia. We recommend that those unfamiliar with BBNs should begin by first developing influence diagrams with relatively simple structures that represent the system under management. Such basic models can then be elaborated to include more variables, the mathematical relations among them, and features that allow assessment of the utility of alternative management actions or strategies. Users of BBNs should be aware of several important limitations, including problems in representing feedback and time-dynamic functions. Nevertheless, when properly used, Bayesian networks can benefit most adaptive-management teams by promoting a shared understanding of the system being managed and encouraging the rigorous examination of alternative management policies.
引用
收藏
页码:3104 / 3116
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Ecological subsystems via graph theory: the role of strongly connected components [J].
Allesina, S ;
Bodini, A ;
Bondavalli, C .
OIKOS, 2005, 110 (01) :164-176
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GUIDELINES USING BAY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, BAYESIAN INFERENCE
[4]   Belief network models of land manager decisions and land use change [J].
Bacon, PJ ;
Cain, JD ;
Howard, DC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 65 (01) :1-23
[5]   Rough set rule induction for suitability assessment [J].
Berger, PA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 34 (04) :546-558
[6]  
British Columbia Ministry of Forests, 2001, SOIL CONS SURV GUID
[7]   The use of Hugin® to develop Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning [J].
Bromley, J ;
Jackson, NA ;
Clymer, OJ ;
Giacomello, AM ;
Jensen, FV .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2005, 20 (02) :231-242
[8]  
Cain J., 1999, Environment, development and sustainability, V1, P123, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1010033215125
[9]  
Coxson DS, 2001, CAN J BOT, V79, P1449, DOI 10.1139/cjb-79-12-1449
[10]   Qualitative stability and ambiguity in model ecosystems [J].
Dambacher, JM ;
Luh, HK ;
Li, HW ;
Rossignol, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2003, 161 (06) :876-888