Breeding for crown gall resistance:: Traditional and molecular approaches

被引:4
作者
Burr, TJ [1 ]
Kovács, L [1 ]
Süle, S [1 ]
Szegedi, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, Geneva, NY 14456 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRAPE GENETICS AND BREEDING, VOLS 1 AND 2 | 2003年 / 603期
关键词
grapevine; crown gall; Agrobacterium vitis; resistance; breeding; genetic; manipulation;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.603.56
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Grapevine crown gall disease, induced mainly by Agrobacterium vitis, causes serious economic losses in several countries. Selection, breeding and genetic engineering of tolerant genotypes are alternative strategies for the effective and sustainable control of the disease. To this end, extensive studies were carried out in Hungary, South-Africa, in the United States and Germany to identify crown gall-tolerant rootstocks and genotypes for breeding resources. The results of these studies revealed that Vitis riparia cv. portalis, V riparia cv. Gloire de Montpellier, and several accessions of V amurensis, as well as their hybrids, responded to Agrobacterium infection with minimal or no tumor formation. V. amurensis inherited crown gall tolerance to its progenies as a single Mendelian trait. Further studies were performed to gain insight into the mechanisms that underlie tolerance. Genetic manipulation of grapevines for crown gall resistance may provide further possibilities to protect traditional varieties. These methods include the inactivation of plant genes that are essential for transformation by Agrobacterium T-DNA as well as introduction of foreign genes that prevent tumor formation. The application of these strategies may provide an efficient tool for engineering crown gall-tolerant grapes in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 447
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Resistance analysis of cherry rootstock ‘CDR-1’ (Prunus mahaleb) to crown gall disease
    Chenglin Liang
    Tian Wan
    Rendun Wu
    Mei Zhao
    Yue Zhao
    Yuliang Cai
    BMC Plant Biology, 20
  • [32] Silencing Agrobacterium oncogenes in transgenic grapevine results in strain-specific crown gall resistance
    A. Galambos
    A. Zok
    A. Kuczmog
    R. Oláh
    P. Putnoky
    W. Ream
    E. Szegedi
    Plant Cell Reports, 2013, 32 : 1751 - 1757
  • [33] Biological control of grapevine crown gall by nonpathogenic Agrobacterium vitis strain VAR03-1
    Kawaguchi A.
    Inoue K.
    Nasu H.
    Journal of General Plant Pathology, 2007, 73 (2) : 133 - 138
  • [34] Effect of siaD on Ag-8 to improve resistance to crown gall in grapes and related mechanisms
    Ni, Xuemei
    Li, Shiyu
    Yuan, Yujin
    Chang, Ruokui
    Liu, Quanyong
    Liu, Zhenxing
    Li, Zhuoran
    Wang, Yuanhong
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2024, 215
  • [35] Natural genetic engineering of plant cells: The molecular biology of crown gall and hairy root disease
    Weising, K
    Kahl, G
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 12 (04) : 327 - 351
  • [36] Alternative Approaches for Assessing Cassava Brown Streak Root Necrosis to Guide Resistance Breeding and Selection
    Kawuki, Robert Sezi
    Esuma, Williams
    Ozimati, Alfred
    Kayondo, Ismail Siraj
    Nandudu, Leah
    Wolfe, Marnin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 10
  • [37] Crown gall of grape: Biology and disease management
    Burr, TJ
    Otten, L
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 37 : 53 - 80
  • [38] Crown gall - A plant tumour with biological activities
    Brantner, AH
    Asres, K
    Chakraborty, A
    Tokuda, H
    Mou, XY
    Mukainaka, T
    Nishino, H
    Stoyanova, S
    Hamburger, M
    PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2003, 17 (04) : 385 - 390
  • [39] PRODUCER FIGHT AGAINST CROWN GALL DISEASE
    Yagci, A.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (03): : 3035 - 3042
  • [40] Evaluation of transgenic 'Chardonnay' (Vitis vinifera) containing magainin genes for resistance to crown gall and powdery mildew
    Vidal, JR
    Kikkert, JR
    Malnoy, MA
    Wallace, PG
    Barnard, J
    Reisch, BI
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (01) : 69 - 82