Promoting Competitive Water Resource Use Efficiency at the Water-Market Scale: An Intercooperative Demand Equilibrium-Based Approach to Water Trading

被引:35
作者
Delorit, Justin D. [1 ]
Block, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
water rights; water markets; water economics; water use efficiency; MAXIMUM ECONOMIC YIELD; MURRAY-DARLING BASIN; MAIPO RIVER-BASIN; DEFICIT IRRIGATION; POPULATION-GROWTH; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ALLOCATION; MANAGEMENT; RISK; MODEL;
D O I
10.1029/2017WR022323
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water rights law and corresponding markets exist to promote economic water resource use efficiency by permitting water rights holders to trade allocations. In some regions, hydrologic uncertainty drives annual assignment of per-water right allocation values. Water rights holders, specifically those involved in agricultural production, may use collaborative water resource decision making to mitigate allocation uncertainty and promote economic and social efficiency. Such is the case in semi-arid North Chile, where interactions between representative farmer groups, treated as resource competitive growers' cooperatives, and modeled at water market-scale, can provide both price and water right allocation distribution signals for unregulated, temporary water right markets. For the range of feasible per-water right allocation values, a coupled agricultural-economic model is developed to describe the equilibrium distribution of water, the corresponding market price of water rights, and the net surplus generated by collaboration between competing agricultural uses. A static, demand-based allocation redistribution ruleset is generated by which the cooperatives are constrained to abide. Water right supply and demand inequality impacts at the market-scale are used to characterize market performance under existing water rights law, and to evaluate the efficacy of intercooperative collaboration over the period 2000-2015. Exclusive intercooperative water trading, following a demand-based ruleset, produces joint mean annual expected profits 24%-122% larger than a case of no-interaction, depending on initial rights distribution. The broader insights of this research suggest that water rights holders engaged in agriculture can achieve enhanced benefits by forming crop-type cooperatives and implementing demand-based allocation redistribution rulesets.
引用
收藏
页码:5394 / 5421
页数:28
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Agent-based modeling to simulate the dynamics of urban water supply: Climate, population growth, and water shortages [J].
Ali, Alireza Mashhadi ;
Shafiee, M. Ehsan ;
Berglund, Emily Zechman .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 28 :420-434
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, WATER ALLOCATION WAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], AGREKON, DOI [10.1080/03031853.2007.9523760, DOI 10.1080/03031853.2007.9523760]
[4]  
Bates B.C., 2008, LINKING CLIMATE CHAN
[5]  
Bauer C.J., 1998, CURRENT PRIVATIZATIO, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-6403-4
[6]   Market Approaches to Water Allocation: Lessons from Latin America [J].
Bauer, Carl .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY WATER RESEARCH & EDUCATION, 2010, 144 (01) :44-49
[7]  
Bauer CJ, 2015, WATER ALTERN, V8, P147
[8]  
Bauer CarlJ., 2004, SIREN SONG CHILEAN W
[9]   Results of Chilean water markets: Empirical research since 1990 [J].
Bauer, CJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2004, 40 (09) :W09S0601-W09S0611
[10]   Experimental evidence on the relative efficiency of forward contracting and tradable entitlements in water markets [J].
Bayer, Ralph C. ;
Loch, Adam .
WATER RESOURCES AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 :1-15