Communicating corporate social responsibility (CSR): Stakeholder responsiveness and engagement strategy to achieve CSR goals

被引:125
作者
Lim, Joon Soo [1 ]
Greenwood, Cary A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, SI Newhouse Sch Publ Commun, Dept Publ Relat, 215 Univ Pl, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Sch Journalism, POB 64, Murfreesboro, TN 37132 USA
关键词
Stakeholder engagement; CSR communication; Dialogic theory; Two-way symmetrical communication; Ethics; REPUTATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.06.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this current study, we compared two contemporary CSR communication strategies (engagement vs. responsiveness), along with communication channels, in achieving CSR goals. We conducted an online survey with public relations, corporate communication, corporate social responsibility, investor relations and sustainability executives within the companies listed on the Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index of publicly traded U.S. companies. Results showed that CSR engagement strategy had a positive effect on achieving all three CSR goals we identified through factor analysis: business, community, and employees. The responsiveness strategy was positively associated with only business and community goal achievement. These findings lend support for the testimonials from industry CSR reports regarding the benefits of the engagement approach in achieving intended organizational goals, including attracting and retaining talented employees. In analyzing the impact of communication channels on goal achievement, we found that print ads played a significant role in achieving business goals.
引用
收藏
页码:768 / 776
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[2]   Corporate social responsibility and CSR fit as predictors of corporate reputation: A global perspective [J].
Aksak, Emel Ozdora ;
Ferguson, Mary Ann ;
Duman, Sirin Atakan .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2016, 42 (01) :79-81
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MANAGING CORPORATE S
[4]  
Carroll A. B., 1999, Business Society, V38, P268, DOI [10.1177/000765039903800303, DOI 10.1177/000765039903800303]
[5]   The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice [J].
Carroll, Archie B. ;
Shabana, Kareem M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2010, 12 (01) :85-105
[6]   Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: An analysis [J].
Clark, CE .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2000, 26 (03) :363-380
[7]   Most valuable stakeholders: The impact of employee orientation on corporate financial performance [J].
de Bussy, Nigel M. ;
Suprawan, Lokweetpun .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2012, 38 (02) :280-287
[8]   Communicating Engagement in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Level Construal of Engagement [J].
Devin, Bree L. ;
Lane, Anne B. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (05) :436-454
[9]   The Paradox of Communicating CSR in India: Minimalist and Strategic Approaches [J].
Dhanesh, Ganga S. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 27 (05) :431-451
[10]   Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication [J].
Du, Shuili ;
Bhattacharya, C. B. ;
Sen, Sankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2010, 12 (01) :8-19