Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research

被引：162

作者：

Curato, Nicole ^{[1
]}

Dryzek, John S. ^{[1
]}

Ercan, Selen A. ^{[1
]}

Hendriks, Carolyn M. ^{[2
]}

Niemeyer, Simon ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia

[2] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia

来源：

DAEDALUS | 2017年 / 146卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1162/DAED_a_00444

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

This essay reflects on the development of the field of deliberative democracy by discussing twelve key findings that capture a number of resolved issues in normative theory, conceptual clarification, and associated empirical results. We argue that these findings deserve to be more widely recognized and viewed as a foundation for future practice and research. We draw on our own research and that of others in the field.

引用

页码：28 / 38

页数：11

共 61 条

[1]

[Anonymous], Z INT BEZIEHUNGEN

[2]

[Anonymous], 2014, DELIBERATIVE MINI PU

[3]

[Anonymous], 1982, Liberalism against Populism

[4]

Baccaro Lucio, 2016, BRIT J POLITICAL SCI, V46

[5] How deliberation affects policy opinions [J].

Barabas, J .

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2004, 98 (04) :687-701

[6]

Bell Daniel A., 1999, DELIBERATIVE POLITIC, P71

[7]

Black LW, 2011, COMMUN SER, P323

[8] Message received? Examining transmission in deliberative systems [J].

Boswell, John ;

Hendriks, Carolyn M. ;

Ercan, Selen A. .

CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2016, 10 (03) :263-283

[9]

CAROLYN M., POLITICS PUBLIC DELI

[10]

Coleman S., 2015, DELIBERATION DEMOCRA

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →