Microsurgical unilateral laminotomy for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results and predictive factors

被引:24
作者
Schoeller, Karsten [1 ]
Steingrueber, Thomas [1 ]
Stein, Marco [1 ]
Vogt, Nina [1 ]
Mueller, Tilman [1 ]
Pons-Kuehnemann, Joern [2 ]
Uhl, Eberhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Dept Neurosurg, Klin Str 33, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[2] Univ Giessen, Med Stat Study Grp, Inst Med Informat, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
关键词
lumbar spinal stenosis; Microsurgical unilateral decompression; Reoperation; Long-term outcome; Predictors; MINIMALLY INVASIVE DECOMPRESSION; 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; BILATERAL DECOMPRESSION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; PREOPERATIVE PREDICTORS; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL CORRELATIONS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; PATIENT-OUTCOMES; REOPERATION RATE;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-016-2804-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The microsurgical unilateral laminotomy (MUL) technique for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a less destabilizing alternative to laminectomy and leads to good short-term outcomes. However, little is known about the long-term results including predictive factors. Medical records of patients who underwent MUL for LSS decompression between 2005 and 2010 were reviewed, and a questionnaire was distributed to complement the long-term outcome data. The study population consisted of 176 patients including 17 patients with stable grade I spondylolisthesis. Complications and reoperations were meticulously analyzed. Clinical outcome was measured using a modified Prolo scale and was further dichotomized in good vs. poor outcome. Predictive factors were obtained from uni- and multivariate analyses. The median age of the cohort was 70.0 years and the follow-up 71.7 months. Complications occurred in 5.1 % of the patients. The overall reoperation rate was 17.0 %, including surgery, which was exclusively performed at other levels in 4.0 %. The reoperation rate for fusion was 4.5 %. Good neurogenic claudication outcome faded from 98.3 % at hospital discharge to 47.2 % at 6 years. Multivariate analysis identified previous lumbar operation as a potential independent predictor of a reoperation; potential independent predictors of poor long-term claudication outcome were older age, female gender, higher body mass index (BMI) and tobacco smoking. In our experience, the long-term reoperation rate after MUL for LSS is not negligible and higher in previously operated patients. It seems like the good initial clinical results after MUL may fade over time, and several patient-related predictive factors including potentially modifiable obesity and tobacco smoking seem to play an important role.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1113
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [31] Lee BH, 2015, J SPINAL DISORD TECH, V28, P47, DOI 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828d003d
  • [32] Decompression Only Versus Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis in Elderly Patients over 75 Years Old: Which is Reasonable?
    Lee, Chang-Hyun
    Hyun, Seung-Jae
    Kim, Ki-Jeong
    Jahng, Tae-Ahn
    Kim, Hyun-Jib
    [J]. NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2013, 53 (12) : 870 - 874
  • [33] Comparing Cost-effectiveness of X-Stop With Minimally Invasive Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lonne, Greger
    Johnsen, Lars Gunnar
    Aas, Eline
    Lydersen, Stian
    Andresen, Hege
    Ronning, Roar
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    [J]. SPINE, 2015, 40 (08) : 514 - 520
  • [34] Minimally Invasive Decompression Versus X-Stop in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study
    Lonne, Greger
    Johnsen, Lars Gunnar
    Rossvoll, Ivar
    Andresen, Hege
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Zwart, John Anker
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    [J]. SPINE, 2015, 40 (02) : 77 - 85
  • [35] Long-term Outcomes of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Tosteson, Anna
    Abdu, William A.
    Zhao, Wenyan
    Morgan, Tamara S.
    Weinstein, James N.
    [J]. SPINE, 2015, 40 (02) : 63 - 76
  • [36] The Risk of Getting Worse: Predictors of Deterioration After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Multicenter Observational Study
    Nerland, Ulf S.
    Jakola, Asgeir S.
    Giannadakis, Charalampis
    Solheim, Ole
    Weber, Clemens
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    Solberg, Tore K.
    Gulati, Sasha
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (04) : 1095 - 1102
  • [37] Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study
    Nerland, Ulf S.
    Jakola, Asgeir S.
    Solheim, Ole
    Weber, Clemens
    Rao, Vidar
    Lonne, Greger
    Solberg, Tore K.
    Salvesen, Oyvind
    Carlsen, Sven M.
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    Gulati, Sasha
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [38] Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression
    Oertel, Markus F.
    Ryang, Yu-Mi
    Korinth, Marcus C.
    Gilsbach, Joachim M.
    Rohde, Veit
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 59 (06) : 1264 - 1269
  • [39] Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Ortega, Alicia
    Sarmiento, J. Manuel
    Patil, Chirag
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Nuno, Miriam
    Lad, Shivanand
    Boakye, Maxwell
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 76 (06) : 443 - 450
  • [40] LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS: PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR BILATERAL MICROSURGICAL DECOMPRESSION USING A UNILATERAL APPROACH
    Papavero, Luca
    Thiel, Marco
    Fritzsche, Erik
    Kunze, Christina
    Westphal, Manfred
    Kothe, Ralph
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 65 (06) : 182 - 187