The DEP-6D, a new preference-based measure to assess health states of dependency

被引:5
|
作者
Rodriguez-Miguez, E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Abellan-Perpinan, J. M. [4 ]
Alvarez, X. C. [1 ]
Gonzalez, X. M. [1 ]
Sampayo, A. R. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, Dept Appl Econ, As Lagoas Marcosende S-N, Vigo 36310, Spain
[2] GRiEE ECOBAS, Madrid, Spain
[3] Inst Biomed Res, Vigo, Spain
[4] Univ Murcia, Dept Appl Econ, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
[5] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Econ, Avda Burgo S-N,Campus Norte, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Spain; Dependency; Preference-based measures; QALY; DEP-6D; Time trade-off; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; OLDER-ADULTS; UTILITY; INDEX; INCONSISTENCIES; VALUES; QALYS; VALUATIONS; INVARIANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In medical literature there are numerous multidimensional scales to measure health states for dependence in activities of daily living. However, these scales are not preference-based and are not able to yield QALYs. On the contrary, the generic preference-based measures are not sensitive enough to measure changes in dependence states. The objective of this paper is to propose a new dependency health state classification system, called DEP-6D, and to estimate its value set in such a way that it can be used in QALY calculations. DEP-6D states are described as a combination of 6 attributes (eat, incontinence, personal care, mobility, housework and cognition problems), with 3-4 levels each. A sample of 312 Spanish citizens was surveyed in 2011 to estimate the DEP-6D preference-scoring algorithm. Each respondent valued six out of the 24 states using time trade-off questions. After excluding those respondents who made two or more inconsistencies (6% out of the sample), each state was valued between 66 and 77 times. The responses present a high internal and external consistency. A random effect model accounting for main effects was the preferred model to estimate the scoring algorithm. The DEP-6D describes, in general, more severe problems than those usually described by means of generic preference-based measures. The minimum score predicted by the DEP-6D algorithm is -0.84, which is considerably lower than the minimum value predicted by the EQ-SD and SF-6D algorithms. The DEP-6D value set is based on community preferences. Therefore it is consistent with the so-called 'societal perspective'. Moreover, DEP-6D preference weights can be used in QALY calculations and cost-utility analysis. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 219
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Developing a cerebral palsy-specific preference-based measure for a six-dimensional classification system (CP-6D): protocol for a valuation study
    Bahrampour, Mina
    Norman, Richard
    Byrnes, Joshua
    Downes, Martin
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [42] The EORTC QLU-C10D is a valid cancer-specific preference-based measure for cost-utility and health technology assessment in the Netherlands
    Pilz, Micha J.
    Seyringer, Simon
    Hallsson, Lara R.
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Jansen, Femke
    King, Madeleine T.
    Norman, Richard
    Rutten, Marianne J.
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Gamper, Eva Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2024, 25 (09): : 1539 - 1555
  • [43] Rasch validation of the short form (8 item) PC-QoL questionnaire and applicability of use as a health state classification system for a new preference-based measure
    Roberts, Jack M.
    Chang, Anne B.
    Goyal, Vikas
    Kapur, Nitin
    Marchant, Julie M.
    Mcphail, Steven M.
    Kularatna, Sanjeewa
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (07) : 1893 - 1903
  • [44] Japanese population norms for preference-based measures: EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D
    Shiroiwa, Takeru
    Fukuda, Takashi
    Ikeda, Shunya
    Igarashi, Ataru
    Noto, Shinichi
    Saito, Shinya
    Shimozuma, Kojiro
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (03) : 707 - 719
  • [45] Estimating a Preference-Based Index for Mental Health From the Recovering Quality of Life Measure: Valuation of Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index
    Keetharuth, Anju Devianee
    Rowen, Donna
    Bjorner, Jakob Bue
    Brazier, John
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (02) : 281 - 290
  • [46] Mapping the Cancer-Specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the Preference-Based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D Instruments
    Kontodimopoulos, Nick
    Aletras, Vassilis H.
    Paliouras, Dimitris
    Niakas, Dimitris
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (08) : 1151 - 1157
  • [47] Associations of cancer and other chronic medical conditions with SF-6D preference-based scores in Medicare beneficiaries
    Ron D. Hays
    Bryce B. Reeve
    Ashley Wilder Smith
    Steven B. Clauser
    Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 385 - 391
  • [48] Predicting an SF-6D Preference-Based Score Using MCS and PCS Scores from the SF-12 or SF-36
    Hanmer, Janel
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (06) : 958 - 966
  • [49] What Matters 2 Adults: a study protocol to develop a new preference-based wellbeing measure with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults (WM2Adults)
    Howard, Kirsten
    Anderson, Kate
    Cunningham, Joan
    Cass, Alan
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Whop, Lisa J.
    Dickson, Michelle
    Viney, Rosalie
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Tong, Allison
    Garvey, Gail
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [50] An international mixed methods study to develop a new preference-based measure for women with breast cancer: the BREAST-Q Utility module
    Kaur, Manraj N.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Xie, Feng
    Bordeleau, Louise
    Zhong, Toni
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Tsangaris, Elena
    Breitkopf, Trisia
    Kuspinar, Ayse
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)