Retention soil filter as post-treatment step to remove micropollutants from sewage treatment plant effluent

被引:27
作者
Brunsch, Andrea F. [1 ,3 ]
ter Laak, Thomas L. [2 ]
Christoffels, Ekkehard [1 ]
Rijnaarts, Huub H. M. [3 ]
Langenhoff, Alette A. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Erftverband, Dept River Basin Management, Erftverband 6, D-50126 Bergheim, Germany
[2] KWR Watercycle Res Inst, POB 1072, NL-3430 BB Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ, Sub Dept Environm Technol, POB 17, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Retention soil filter; Constructed wetlands; Granular activated carbon; Micropollutants; Wastewater treatment; Post-treatment step; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; RIVER BANK FILTRATION; ANTIBIOTIC SULFAMETHOXAZOLE; ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS; TRANSFORMATION PRODUCTS; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; URBAN WASTEWATERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Retention soil filters (RSFs) are a specific form of vertical flow constructed wetlands for the treatment of rain water and/or wastewater. We have tested 3 pilot RSFs to investigate removal of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and 14 different organic micropollutants (OMPs) from the effluent of a large scale sewage treatment plant (STP). Two of them were operated as conventional RSF with material (sand with CaCO3 and organic matter) from two different full-scale RSFs. The third pilot RSF contained filter material (sand with CaCO3) with additional biochar in the upper layer (0-10 cm) and granulated activated carbon (GAC) in the lower layer (60-90 cm). The filters were planted with Phragmites australis. The RSFs were operated and monitored for 3 years, and water samples were taken regularly at inflow, outflows and in 3 depths within the filters. In total 523 samples were taken. In the conventional RSF, best median removal was detected for galaxolide, diclofenac 4-hydroxy, metoprolol and clarithromycin (75-79%). No removal was seen for sulfamethoxazole and carbamazepine. The DOC and OMP removal in the conventional RSFs was best in the upper layer with highest organic matter content, increased in time over the three years of operation and also with extended contact time. In the effluent of the RSF with GAC, 10 out of the 14 OMPs could not be detected; 4 OMPs were detected, but only metformin with removal < 80%, thus showing a more efficient removal than the conventional RSF. A decrease in DOC removal was detected in the GAC layer (>88% to 60%) over the 2.5 years of operation. Biochar was most effective in OMP removal in the first operational year. It can be concluded that the increasing removal efficiency of the conventional RSF material - also present in the RSF with biochar and GAC - might mitigate the reduced efficiency of the sorbent additives biochar and GAC. This enables to extend the operational lifetime of the filters with acceptable removal rates. Finally, our study demonstrates that an RSF with GAC shows an enhanced removal of OMPs, which is a suitable post-treatment step for STPs. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1098 / 1107
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Combination of granular activated carbon adsorption and deep-bed filtration as a single advanced wastewater treatment step for organic micropollutant and phosphorus removal
    Altmann, Johannes
    Rehfeld, Daniel
    Traeder, Kai
    Sperlich, Alexander
    Jekel, Martin
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 92 : 131 - 139
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, INN DIG EN LAND NORD
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, ENV ORGANIC CHEM
  • [4] Performance of granular activated carbon to remove micropollutants from municipal wastewater-A meta-analysis of pilot- and large-scale studies
    Benstoem, Frank
    Nahrstedt, Andreas
    Boehler, Marc
    Knopp, Gregor
    Montag, David
    Siegrist, Hansruedi
    Pinnekamp, Johannes
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2017, 185 : 105 - 118
  • [5] The effect of redox conditions and adaptation time on organic micropollutant removal during river bank filtration: A laboratory-scale column study
    Bertelkamp, C.
    Verliefde, A. R. D.
    Schoutteten, K.
    Vanhaecke, L.
    Vanden Bussche, J.
    Singhal, N.
    van der Hoek, J. P.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 544 : 309 - 318
  • [6] Sorption and biodegradation of organic micropollutants during river bank filtration: A laboratory column study
    Bertelkamp, C.
    Reungoat, J.
    Cornelissen, E. R.
    Singhal, N.
    Reynisson, J.
    Cabo, A. J.
    van der Hoek, J. P.
    Verliefde, A. R. D.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 52 : 231 - 241
  • [7] Activated soil filters (bio filters) for the elimination of xenobiotics (micro-pollutants) from storm- and waste waters
    Bester, Kai
    Schaefer, Daniel
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (10) : 2639 - 2646
  • [8] Direct Photolysis of Human Metabolites of the Antibiotic Sulfamethoxazole: Evidence for Abiotic Back-Transformation
    Bonvin, Florence
    Omlin, Julien
    Rutler, Rebecca
    Schweizer, W. Bernd
    Alaimo, Peter J.
    Strathmann, Timothy J.
    McNeill, Kristopher
    Kohn, Tamar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (13) : 6746 - 6755
  • [9] Retention of pharmaceutical residues and microorganisms at the Altendorf retention soil filter
    Christoffels, E.
    Mertens, F. M.
    Kistemann, T.
    Schreiber, C.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 70 (09) : 1503 - 1509
  • [10] Carbamazepine as a possible anthropogenic marker in the aquatic environment: investigations on the behaviour of Carbamazepine in wastewater treatment and during groundwater infiltration
    Clara, M
    Strenn, B
    Kreuzinger, N
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (04) : 947 - 954